These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8431826)

  • 1. US resistance to Canadian mammogram study not only about data.
    Gray C
    CMAJ; 1993 Feb; 148(4):622-3. PubMed ID: 8431826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's compliance with public health guidelines for mammograms and pap tests in Canada and the United States: an analysis of data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey Of Health.
    Blackwell DL; Martinez ME; Gentleman JF
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 18182305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
    Suarez L; Pulley L
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.
    Maxwell CJ; Bancej CM; Snider J
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 11232132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The politics of mammography.
    McLelland R; Pisano ED
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 1732930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.
    Hsia J; Kemper E; Kiefe C; Zapka J; Sofaer S; Pettinger M; Bowen D; Limacher M; Lillington L; Mason E
    Prev Med; 2000 Sep; 31(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 10964640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women's preventive screening in rural health clinics.
    Edwards JB; Tudiver F
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 18457753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].
    Giard RW; Bonneux LG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov; 145(46):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11757241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Financial barriers to mammography: who pays out-of-pocket?
    Makuc DM; Breen N; Meissner HI; Vernon SW; Cohen A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 16(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 17439380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening under 50: a limited perspective on a multifaceted issue.
    Royak-Schaler R; Gallant SJ; Klabunde CN
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):243-9; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer screening among southwest American Indian women living on-reservation.
    Giuliano A; Papenfuss M; de Guernsey de Zapien J; Tilousi S; Nuvayestewa L
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 9465364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors.
    Achat H; Close G; Taylor R
    Prev Med; 2005 Jul; 41(1):312-20. PubMed ID: 15917027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debating benzodiazepine use.
    Lexchin J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Aug; 41():1293, 1295. PubMed ID: 7580376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
    Patti J; Lee C
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
    Berlin L; Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
    Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographers debate screening guidelines.
    Barnes DE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Jul; 14(7):59-73. PubMed ID: 10147530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
    Baines CJ
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):298; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 20851950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.