These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8432106)

  • 1. Long-term evaluation and rerestoration of amalgam restorations.
    Akerboom HB; Advokaat JG; Van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Feb; 21(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 8432106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: a clinical survey.
    McDaniel RJ; Davis RD; Murchison DF; Cohen RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Feb; 131(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 10680384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan.
    Al Negrish AR
    Int Dent J; 2001 Apr; 51(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 11569662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analyses of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1991 Feb; 49(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 2024575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist V; Thylstrup A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Dec; 44(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 3469862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replacement reasons and service time of class-II amalgam restorations in relation to cavity design.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1991 Apr; 49(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 2053429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations.
    Hodges DJ; Mangum FI; Ward MT
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 7587139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical behavior of repaired amalgam restorations: a two-year study.
    Cipriano TM; Santos JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 7699605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of proximal secondary caries at cervical class II-amalgam restoration margins in vitro.
    Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Seemann R; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 22429927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.