These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8432652)

  • 1. Should ICRP have prescribed an averaging period for the occupational dose limit in its basic general recommendations?
    Fry RM; Carter MW
    Health Phys; 1993 Mar; 64(3):319-20. PubMed ID: 8432652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New ICRP recommendations.
    Wrixon AD
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A new radiation protection dose limit for occupationally exposed personnel in the Federal Republic of Germany].
    Martignoni K; Nitschke J
    Radiologe; 1991 May; 31(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 1876694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the recommendations of ICRP/90/G-01.
    Dennis JA
    Radiat Res; 1990 Sep; 123(3):349-50. PubMed ID: 2217732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [From the Publication 9 to the Publication 26 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (author's transl)].
    Polvani C
    Med Lav; 1979; 70(6):494-504. PubMed ID: 553238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Consequences of the recommendations of the ICRP].
    Jacobi W
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1988; 30():121-35. PubMed ID: 3222795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the criteria used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to justify the setting of numerical protection level values.
    ICRP Supporting Guidance 5
    Ann ICRP; 2006; 36(4):iii, 7-76. PubMed ID: 17371701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low doses of radiation linked to small increase in cancer risk.
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):332-3. PubMed ID: 16312034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the new nuclear decay data of ICRP publication 107 on inhalation dose coefficients for workers.
    Manabe K; Endo A; Eckerman KF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 19914964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of the system of radiological protection: the justification for new ICRP recommendations.
    J Radiol Prot; 2003 Jun; 23(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 12875546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A note on certain inconsistencies in ICRP-60.
    Mayya YS; Mehta SK; Nambi KS
    Health Phys; 1993 Mar; 64(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8432656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of the draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP on secondary derived regulatory values being considered by the US Department of Energy.
    O'Connell P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16105895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ICRP comes up trumps.
    Webb G
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):251-2. PubMed ID: 16926467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective quality factors for neutrons based on the revised ICRP/ICRU recommendations.
    Veinot KG; Hertel NE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16381781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of the ICRP 2007 recommendations in Korea.
    Cho KW; Kim YM
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1286-9. PubMed ID: 19299151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A commentary on some inconsistencies in the icrp 2005 recommendations: exclusion levels.
    Kramer GH
    Health Phys; 2006 Jul; 91(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16775474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiological versus chemical toxicity limits for varying enrichments of uranium for Department of Energy facilities.
    O'Connell P; Rabovsky J; Foulke J
    Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98 Suppl 1():S17-21. PubMed ID: 20065666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Translation of dose coefficients From ICRP 53 to ICRP 80.
    Moussa HM; Melanson MA
    Health Phys; 2013 Feb; 104(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 23274826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose limits to the lens of the eye: International Basic Safety Standards and related guidance.
    Boal TJ; Pinak M
    Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):112-7. PubMed ID: 25816264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.