These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8432660)

  • 1. The effect of periodic bottlenecks on the competitive ability of Drosophila pseudoobscura lines.
    López Bueno JA; Moya A; González-Candelas F
    Heredity (Edinb); 1993 Jan; 70 ( Pt 1)():60-6. PubMed ID: 8432660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bottleneck effect on intra- and interspecific competition in Drosophila malerkotliana.
    Hegde SN; Krishna MS
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1999 Apr; 37(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 10641172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable effects of crowding on Drosophila hosts of male-lethal and non-male-lethal spiroplasmas in laboratory populations.
    Ebbert MA
    Heredity (Edinb); 1995 Mar; 74 ( Pt 3)():227-40. PubMed ID: 7706112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Historical effective size and the level of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Choudhary M; Singh RS
    Biochem Genet; 1987 Feb; 25(1-2):41-51. PubMed ID: 3107543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition between mitochondrial haplotypes in distinct nuclear genetic environments: Drosophila pseudoobscura vs. D. persimilis.
    Hutter CM; Rand DM
    Genetics; 1995 Jun; 140(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 7498735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competition between strains of Drosophila willistoni and D. pseudoobscura.
    Mourão CA; Ayala FJ
    Experientia; 1971 Mar; 27(3):343. PubMed ID: 5546669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population bottlenecks increase additive genetic variance but do not break a selection limit in rain forest Drosophila.
    van Heerwaarden B; Willi Y; Kristensen TN; Hoffmann AA
    Genetics; 2008 Aug; 179(4):2135-46. PubMed ID: 18689893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dobzhansky's concept of genetic coadaptation: Drosophila ananassae is an exception to this concept.
    Singh BN
    J Genet; 2018 Sep; 97(4):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 30262716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of bottlenecks on incipient sexual isolation, mating activity and fertility in Drosophila malerkotliana.
    Hegde SN; Krishna MS
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1996 May; 34(5):440-3. PubMed ID: 9063077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A re-evaluation of 12S ribosomal RNA variability in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Noor MA; Larkin JC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Jun; 17(6):938-41. PubMed ID: 10833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fail to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2557-65. PubMed ID: 14686531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives.
    Machado CA; Kliman RM; Markert JA; Hey J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):472-88. PubMed ID: 11919289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restriction-map variation in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Schaeffer SW; Aquadro CF; Anderson WW
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 May; 4(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 2833670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. INTERSPECIFIC LABORATORY COMPETITION OF THE RECENTLY SYMPATRIC SPECIES DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.
    Pascual M; Serra L; Ayala FJ
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):269-274. PubMed ID: 28568145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative effect of genetic bottlenecks on the adaptability of vesicular stomatitis virus.
    Novella IS
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Feb; 336(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 14741203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection at the PGM-1 and Me-2 loci.
    Marinković D; Ayala FJ
    Genetics; 1975 Jan; 79(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 1126623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular evolution of X-linked accessory gland proteins in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Stevison LS; Counterman BA; Noor MA
    J Hered; 2004; 95(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 15073226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Desiccation resistance in two species of Drosophila.
    Levine L; Rockwell RF; Laverde MJ
    J Hered; 1986; 77(5):359-60. PubMed ID: 3772067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic divergence under uniform selection. III. Selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol in Drosophila pseudoobscura populations and their replicate lines.
    Hoffman AA; Cohan FM
    Heredity (Edinb); 1987 Jun; 58 ( Pt 3)():425-33. PubMed ID: 3597126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.