BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8432948)

  • 1. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The composite resin restoration: a literature review, Part III. What the future holds.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8432949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations.
    Borgmeijer PJ; Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 1939803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The combined composite resin and amalgam restoration for posterior teeth: a clinical report.
    Roda RS; Zwicker PF
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jan; 23(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 1631274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetic composite resin facings for amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL; Scrabeck JG; Robinson FB
    Gen Dent; 1983; 31(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 6575935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical study on direct and indirect Class II posterior composite resin restorations: design of the investigation.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Kemp-Scholte CM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 1939791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement technique for direct posterior composite restorations.
    Javaheri DS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):195-200; quiz 202. PubMed ID: 11360766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Johnson GH; Gordon GE; Bales DJ
    Oper Dent; 1988; 13(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 3270041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
    Bertolotti RL
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB; Roberts HW
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 12412958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):342-4. PubMed ID: 15195736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.