These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8433651)

  • 1. Perceptual grouping in visual word recognition.
    Bock JM; Monk AF; Hulme C
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 8433651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A developmental evaluation of the role of word shape in word recognition.
    Healy AF; Cunningham TF
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Mar; 20(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 1565012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):924-41. PubMed ID: 1837304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.
    Humphreys GW; Mayall K; Cooper AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 15000542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tilted letters and tilted words: a possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition.
    Driver J; Baylis GC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 7476242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting effects of letter-spacing in alexia: further evidence that different strategies generate word length effects in reading.
    Price CJ; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Aug; 48(3):573-97. PubMed ID: 7568992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter visibility and word recognition: the optimal viewing position in printed words.
    Nazir TA; Heller D; Sussmann C
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 1408642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical control of within-word eye movements.
    Pynte J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):958-69. PubMed ID: 8756962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: a subsystems resolution.
    Marsolek C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1233-59. PubMed ID: 15513245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors.
    Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: facilitatory or inhibitory?
    Snodgrass JG; Mintzer M
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Mar; 21(2):247-66. PubMed ID: 8469133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the process of recognizing inverted words: does it rely only on orientation-invariant cues?
    Navon D; Raveh O
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1103-17. PubMed ID: 15813493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction time to a word in different orientations with letters rotated separately in different orientations.
    Windes JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 2038527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.