These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8433899)

  • 1. Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane.
    Nemire K; Cohen MM
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 8433899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of optical pitch on oculomotor control and the perception of target elevation.
    Cohen MM; Ebenholtz SM; Linder BJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 May; 57(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 7596741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical.
    Trousselard M; Cian C; Nougier V; Pla S; Raphel C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1179-87. PubMed ID: 14710953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical and somesthetic biases of postural orientation in the pitch dimension.
    Nemire K; Cohen MM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 May; 656():871-3. PubMed ID: 1599205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers.
    Li W; Dallal N; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2873-94. PubMed ID: 11701181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL).
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2845-72. PubMed ID: 11701180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visually perceived eye level is influenced identically by lines from erect and pitched planes.
    Li W; Matin L
    Perception; 1996; 25(7):831-52. PubMed ID: 8923552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch.
    Matin L; Li W
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):84-104. PubMed ID: 7885810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway.
    Peterka RJ; Benolken MS
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 105(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 7589307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level.
    Stoper AE; Cohen MM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 2813032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial orientation and balance control changes induced by altered gravitoinertial force vectors.
    Kaufman GD; Wood SJ; Gianna CC; Black FO; Paloski WH
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):397-410. PubMed ID: 11355385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inertial acceleration as a measure of linear vection: an alternative to magnitude estimation.
    Carpenter-Smith TR; Futamura RG; Parker DE
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7885806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.
    Li W; Matin L
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7885809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do visual and postural cues combine for self-tilt perception during slow pitch rotations?
    Scotto Di Cesare C; Buloup F; Mestre DR; Bringoux L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():51-9. PubMed ID: 25299446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why do pitched horizontal lines have such a small effect on visually perceived eye level?
    Post RB; Welch RB; Clark VD
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 May; 62(4):726-34. PubMed ID: 10883581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 1994 Feb; 34(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 8160367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.
    Asch SE; Witkin HA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Dec; 121(4):407-18; discussion 404-6. PubMed ID: 1431735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of gravitational and optical stimulation on the perception of target elevation.
    Cohen MM; Stoper AE; Welch RB; DeRoshia CW
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 11304014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception.
    Previc FH; Kenyon RV; Boer ER; Johnson BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 8351192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a visual frame and of low radial accelerations on the visually perceived eye level.
    Raphel C; Barraud PA; Koessler C; Cian C
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Aug; 58(6):906-14. PubMed ID: 8768185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.