These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8433911)

  • 1. Attentional distribution in the visual field during same-different judgments as assessed by response competition.
    Pan K; Eriksen CW
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 8433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is evidence for late selection due to automatic or attentional processing of stimulus identities?
    Fournier LR; Shorter S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):991-1003. PubMed ID: 11578060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of variation of an irrelevant dimension on same-different visual judgments.
    Ballesteros S; Manga D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Jun; 92(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 8693950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Location dominance in attending to color and shape.
    Tsal Y; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8440981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attentional delays and attentional capture among simultaneous visual onset elements.
    Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):536-50. PubMed ID: 7991351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Display polarity, stimulus exposure duration, and visual lobe shape.
    Chiu CH; Chan AH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Apr; 104(2):467-80. PubMed ID: 17566436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions.
    Taylor TL; Donnelly MP
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 18377168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surveying a blank field with the attentional spotlight.
    Mendez MF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):560-8. PubMed ID: 14620245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.
    Sally SL; Vidnyánsky Z; Papathomas TV
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):529-53. PubMed ID: 19891852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.
    Estes WK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Jun; 8(3):353-82. PubMed ID: 6212628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.
    Castiello U; Umiltà C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 2353586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attending to an object's color entails attending to its location: support for location-special views of visual attention.
    Tsal Y; Lamy D
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):960-8. PubMed ID: 10997042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Vuilleumier PO; Rafal RD
    Brain; 2000 Jun; 123 ( Pt 6)():1263-79. PubMed ID: 10825363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences.
    Joseph JS; Optican LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):651-65. PubMed ID: 8710445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional enhancement opposite a peripheral flash revealed using change blindness.
    Tse PU; Sheinberg DL; Logothetis NK
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 12661668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same-different task.
    Watanabe T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Feb; 14(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 2964502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.