These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8434090)

  • 21. [As always, human quality takes precedence over equipment quality. Reflections on quality assurance of screening mammography and the ineluctable evolution towards digital systems].
    Stines J
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 12736584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome measures of an Australian breast-screening program.
    Rodger A; Kavanagh AM
    Med J Aust; 1998 Aug; 169(4):179-80. PubMed ID: 9734571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The negative impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) on rural mammography programs.
    Inman M
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10181470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Mammogram results in ambulatory care--a mammography quality circle in Braunschweig, Germany, between 1998 and 2001].
    Derra M; Green E; Hintner H; Hübler R; Sabih S; Thieme H; Wezler U; Robra BP; Swart E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15487384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Danish Quality Database for Mammography Screening].
    Vejborg I; Mikkelsen EM; Schwartz W; Bak M; Lernevall A; Borg Mogensen N; Garne JP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2533. PubMed ID: 23079436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assurance in breast cancer screening.
    Grey JA
    Aust Clin Rev; 1988 Dec; 8(31):177-80. PubMed ID: 3240138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.
    Daly L
    Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR; Autier P
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Quality assurance in a mass screening project of breast cancer].
    den Otter G
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Mar; 133(10):502-3. PubMed ID: 2710230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Callback rate after screening mammography.
    Linver MN; Rosenberg RD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):262-3. PubMed ID: 9648803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Meyer P; Zinninger M; Wilcox P
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):27-8, 30, 33-6. PubMed ID: 10106046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
    Ellis RL
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast cancer screening practice of Chinese elderly worth re-evaluation of health promotion policy.
    Chor JS; Leung JC; Chan DC; Leung PC; Griffiths S
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Mar; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 18211917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Provider's volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment.
    Hébert-Croteau N; Roberge D; Brisson J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Oct; 105(2):117-32. PubMed ID: 17186361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammography and breast cancer.
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2004 Nov; 102(11):528. PubMed ID: 15584208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality assurance results from a breast screening pilot study.
    Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 1953503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.