224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8434162)
1. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome].
Ito T; Nishino M; Nakagawa T; Okada T; Hasegawa S; Kuryu T; Ebisuno S; Ohnishi S; Tanahashi H; Yasuno M
Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing.
Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of rate-responsive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Nishino M; Ito T; Miyawaki M; Nakagawa T; Kuryu T; Tanahashi H; Yamada Y; Abe H
Angiology; 1994 May; 45(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8172382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Chronic frequency-adaptive pacemaker therapy in patients with heart failure].
Haltern G; Kempa L; Ochs JG; Hanrath P; Sigmund M
Z Kardiol; 1995 Oct; 84(10):834-43. PubMed ID: 7502571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK
Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cardiopulmonary stress: control of the function of frequency variable pacemaker systems].
Treese N; Coutinho M; Ophoff N; Rhein S; Pop T; Meyer J
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 2378157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Passman R; Banthia S; Galvez D; Sheldon T; Kadish A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST).
Link MS; Hellkamp AS; Estes NA; Orav EJ; Ellenbogen KA; Ibrahim B; Greenspon A; Rizo-Patron C; Goldman L; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 43(11):2066-71. PubMed ID: 15172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].
Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adequacy of pacing rate during exercise in rate responsive ventricular pacing.
Hasegawa A; Hatori M; Amano M; Iijima T; Adachi H; Yamaguchi E; Fukuda T; Murata K; Nagai R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):307-12. PubMed ID: 9058868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with bradycardia].
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Mizumaki K; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Sasayama S
J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):503-12. PubMed ID: 1339809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical experience with a new rate-responsive TX pacemaker.
Yasuno M; Nishino Y; Nishino M; Akashi T; Tanahashi H; Kobayashi K; Yamada Y; Inoue M
Angiology; 1986 Dec; 37(12 Pt 1):888-95. PubMed ID: 3813117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
