These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8434496)

  • 1. Intralaboratory reproducibility in cervical cytology. Results of the application of a 100-slide set.
    Confortini M; Biggeri A; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi FM; Minuti PA; Russo A; Palli D
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8434496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intralaboratory reproducibility of cervical cytology diagnoses in the external quality assurance scheme of the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.
    Sama D; Cotignoli T; Guerrini L; Maioli P; Sintoni C; Bucchi L
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 8774647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
    Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
    Evered A; Dudding N
    Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consistency of reporting endocervical cells. An intralaboratory and interlaboratory assessment.
    Mitchell H
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 8191817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a national survey.
    Confortini M; Di Bonito L; Carozzi F; Ghiringhello B; Montanari G; Parisio F; Prandi S;
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 17168918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inadequate cervical smears: results of an educational slide exchange scheme. Trent Gynaecological Pathology Quality Assurance Group.
    Cytopathology; 1999 Feb; 10(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10068883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
    Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
    Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic concordance in gynecologic cytology].
    Lazcano Ponce EC; de Ruiz PA; Martínez Arias C; Murguía Riechers L
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9380963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: an Italian experience.
    Montanari G; Confortini M; Bellomi A; Cocchi V; Dalla Palma P; D'Ambrosio E; Giovagnoli MR; Navone R; Ronco G;
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12672101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quality control system involving peer review of abnormal cervical smears.
    Palli D; Confortini M; Biggeri A; Russo A; Cariaggi P; Carozzi F; Minuti PA
    Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8453014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving consistency in cervical cytology reporting.
    Mitchell H
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(19):1592-6. PubMed ID: 8411232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of agreement between conventional and liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer early detection based on analysis of 2,091 smears: experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
    Girianelli VR; Santos Thuler LC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):545-9. PubMed ID: 17703446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telecytology: intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of cervical-vaginal smears.
    Alli PM; Ollayos CW; Thompson LD; Kapadia I; Butler DR; Williams BH; Rosenthal DL; O'leary TJ
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Dec; 32(12):1318-22. PubMed ID: 11774163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of documenting clinical appearance of the uterine cervix in the cervical cytology form.
    Al-Kadri HM; Hajeer AH; Al-Hawashim NS; Salem HH
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1698-702. PubMed ID: 17106544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic reproducibility of Pap testing in two regions of Mexico: the need for quality control mechanisms.
    de Ruíz PA; Lazcano Ponce EC; Duarte Torres R; Ruíz Juárez I; Martínez Cortez I
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):330-8. PubMed ID: 9041744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reproducibility of estimating the adequacy of the squamous component of cervicovaginal smears.
    Renshaw AA; Friedman MM; Rahemtulla A; Granter SR; Dean BR; Cronin JA; Jiroutek M; Cibas ES
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jan; 111(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 9894452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cytology reading times: a comparison between ThinPrep Imager and conventional methods.
    Davey E; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; D'Assuncao J; Richards A; Farnsworth A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):550-4. PubMed ID: 17703458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.