195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8434909)
1. Inhibition of ruminal cellulose fermentation by extracts of the perennial legume cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer).
Weimer PJ; Hatfield RD; Buxton DR
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 59(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 8434909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: pure-culture studies with cellulose and alkaline peroxide-treated wheat straw.
Odenyo AA; Mackie RI; Stahl DA; White BA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 60(10):3697-703. PubMed ID: 7527202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competition for cellulose among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria under substrate-excess and substrate-limited conditions.
Shi Y; Odt CL; Weimer PJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 63(2):734-42. PubMed ID: 9023950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilization of individual cellodextrins by three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria.
Shi Y; Weimer PJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Mar; 62(3):1084-8. PubMed ID: 8975600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of dilution rate and pH on the ruminal cellulolytic bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 in cellulose-fed continuous culture.
Weimer PJ
Arch Microbiol; 1993; 160(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 8239881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Production of succinate from glucose, cellobiose, and various cellulosic materials by the ruminal anaerobic bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
Gokarn RR; Eiteman MA; Martin SA; Eriksson KE
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 1997; 68(1-2):69-80. PubMed ID: 9373931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Degradation of cellulose and forage fiber fractions by ruminal cellulolytic bacteria alone and in coculture with phenolic monomer-degrading bacteria.
Varel VH; Jung HG; Krumholz LR
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4993-5000. PubMed ID: 1667013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: development of probes for Ruminococcus species and evidence for bacteriocin production.
Odenyo AA; Mackie RI; Stahl DA; White BA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 60(10):3688-96. PubMed ID: 7527201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages.
Fondevila M; Dehority BA
J Anim Sci; 1996 Mar; 74(3):678-84. PubMed ID: 8707727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential fermentation of cellulose allomorphs by ruminal cellulolytic bacteria.
Weimer PJ; French AD; Calamari TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 Nov; 57(11):3101-6. PubMed ID: 16348578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Degradation of maize stem by two rumen fungal species, Piromyces communis and Caecomyces communis, in pure cultures or in association with cellulolytic bacteria.
Roger V; Grenet E; Jamot J; Bernalier A; Fonty G; Gouet P
Reprod Nutr Dev; 1992; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 1418394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Competition among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in the absence or presence of non-cellulolytic bacteria.
Chen J; Weimer P
Microbiology (Reading); 2001 Jan; 147(Pt 1):21-30. PubMed ID: 11160797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 13C and 1H NMR study of cellulose metabolism by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.
Bibollet X; Bosc N; Matulova M; Delort AM; Gaudet G; Forano E
J Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 77(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 10674213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Competition for cellobiose among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria under substrate-excess and substrate-limited conditions.
Shi Y; Weimer PJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 63(2):743-8. PubMed ID: 9023951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Competition between ruminal cellulolytic bacteria for adhesion to cellulose.
Mosoni P; Fonty G; Gouet P
Curr Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 9175559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro digestibility of mountain-grown irrigated perennial legume, grass and forb forages is influenced by elevated non-fibrous carbohydrates and plant secondary compounds.
Zhang Y; MacAdam JW; Villalba JJ; Dai X
J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Jan; 101(1):334-340. PubMed ID: 32627840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactions between rumen bacterial strains during the degradation and utilization of the monosaccharides of barley straw cell-walls.
Miron J; Duncan SH; Stewart CS
J Appl Bacteriol; 1994 Mar; 76(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 8157547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria.
Hiltner P; Dehority BA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 46(3):642-8. PubMed ID: 6639018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 ferments ball-milled cellulose as fast as cellobiose until cellulose surface area is limiting.
Fields MW; Mallik S; Russell JB
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2000 Oct; 54(4):570-4. PubMed ID: 11092634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why don't ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster?
Weimer PJ
J Dairy Sci; 1996 Aug; 79(8):1496-502. PubMed ID: 8880475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
