207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8435244)
1. Atrial adaptive rate pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects on exercise capacity and arrhythmias.
Haywood GA; Katritsis D; Ward J; Leigh-Jones M; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Br Heart J; 1993 Feb; 69(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8435244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Benefits and limits of single chamber atrial pacing with adaptive rate].
Pouillot C; Mabo P; Lelong B; Cazeau S; Paillard F; de Place C; Daubert JC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Nov; 83(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 2125194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atrial rate adaptive pacing: what happens to AV conduction?
Linde C; Nordlander R; Rosenqvist M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Oct; 17(10):1581-9. PubMed ID: 7800559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.
Nielsen JC; Kristensen L; Andersen HR; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(4):614-23. PubMed ID: 12932590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
Heart; 2004 Jun; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise.
Gallik DM; Guidry GW; Mahmarian JJ; Verani MS; Spencer WH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 7513403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term survival of chosen atrial-based pacing modalities.
Irwin M; Carbol B; Senaratne M; Gulamhusein S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1796-8. PubMed ID: 8945043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Passman R; Banthia S; Galvez D; Sheldon T; Kadish A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes.
Zhang YY; Wu DY; Fu NK; Lu FM; Xu J
J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23816931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AAI pacing mode: when is it indicated and how should it be achieved?
Katritsis D; Camm AJ
Clin Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 8458114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease.
Tripp IG; Armstrong GP; Stewart JT; Hood MA; Smith WM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 15826261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical safety and efficacy of single-chamber atrial pacing in sick sinus syndrome: long-term follow-up].
Moríñigo JL; Arribas A; Ledesma C; Sánchez PL; Martín F; Martín Luengo C
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2002 Dec; 55(12):1267-72. PubMed ID: 12459076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
