207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8435244)
21. [Chronotropic competence in patients with the sick sinus syndrome wearing AAI or DDD pacemakers].
Goicolea de Oro A; Márquez L; López Gil M; Kallmeyer C; Chicote R; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 46(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 8316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is AAI or AAIR still a viable mode of pacing?
Santini M; Ricci R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 11310294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia].
Drogaĭtsev AD
Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rate augmentation and atrial arrhythmias in DDDR pacing.
Spencer WH; Markowitz T; Alagona P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1847-51. PubMed ID: 1704552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single lead atrial vs. dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome: extended register-based follow-up in the DANPACE trial.
Brandt NH; Kirkfeldt RE; Nielsen JC; Mortensen LS; Jensen GVH; Johansen JB; Haugan K
Europace; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 28039212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Senaratne J; Herath TT; Beaudette D; Irwin M; Gulamhusein S; Senaratne MP
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(42):e12833. PubMed ID: 30334983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
Masumoto H; Ueda Y; Kato R; Usui A; Maseki T; Takagi Y; Usui M
Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DDDR pacing results in left ventricular asynchrony with preservation of ejection fraction and NT-proBNP: a prospective study in sick sinus syndrome and normal ventricular function.
Psychari SN; Apostolou TS; Iliodromitis EK; Charalampopoulos A; Kremastinos DT
Int J Cardiol; 2010 Oct; 144(2):310-2. PubMed ID: 19342110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing--effect of pacing mode and rate.
Nielsen JC; Bøttcher M; Nielsen TT; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 May; 35(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 10807447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cardiodynamic and neurohormonal importance of atrial contribution in rate-responsive pacing.
Seino Y; Shimai S; Nagae Y; Ibuki C; Takano T; Tanaka S; Hayakawa H
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jul; 72(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 8390792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode.
Mabo P; Cebron JP; Solnon A; Tassin A; Graindorge L; Gras D
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 35(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 22836479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lack of physiological adaptation of the atrioventricular interval to heart rate in patients chronically paced in the AAIR mode.
Mabo P; Pouillot C; Kermarrec A; Lelong B; Lebreton H; Daubert C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Dec; 14(12):2133-42. PubMed ID: 1723196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Atrial rate-responsive pacing in sinus node disease.
Rosenqvist M; Arén C; Kristensson BE; Nordlander R; Schüller H
Eur Heart J; 1990 Jun; 11(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 2351162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison.
Albertsen AE; Nielsen JC; Poulsen SH; Mortensen PT; Pedersen AK; Hansen PS; Jensen HK; Egeblad H
Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 18192700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers.
Osswald S; Leiggener C; Buser PT; Pfisterer ME; Burckhardt D; Burkart F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 19(6):890-8. PubMed ID: 8774818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Selecting the appropriate pacing mode for patients with sick sinus syndrome: evidence from randomized clinical trials.
Albertsen AE; Nielsen JC
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 15071265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Mitsuoka T; Kenny RA; Yeung TA; Chan SL; Perrins JE; Sutton R
Br Heart J; 1988 Oct; 60(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 3056477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Atrial pacing of transplanted heart.
Kutarski A; Zakliczyński M; Oleszczak K; Wojarski J; Foremny J; Kuśnierz J; Jaworska M; Puszczewicz D; Łakomski B; Kalarus Z; Religa Z; Widomska-Czekajska T; Zembala M
Ann Transplant; 2002; 7(2):18-27. PubMed ID: 12416468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
