207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8435244)
41. Respiratory-dependent atrial pacing, management of sinus node disease.
Rognoni G; Bolognese L; Aina F; Occhetta E; Magnani A; Rossi P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1853-9. PubMed ID: 2463558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of low rate dual chamber pacing to activity responsive rate variable ventricular pacing.
Batey RL; Sweesy MW; Scala G; Forney RC
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 May; 13(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 1693204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimizing right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease and prolonged PQ interval: The impact on exercise capacity.
Krzyżanowski K; Michałkiewicz D; Orski Z; Wierzbowski R; Ryczek R; Cwetsch A
Cardiol J; 2015; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 24846513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Physiologic limitations of dual chamber stimulators during physical activity].
Rossi P; Occhetta E; Prando MD; Magnani A; Perucca A; Rognoni G; Aina F
G Ital Cardiol; 1987 Aug; 17(8):673-9. PubMed ID: 3692072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Permanent atrial stimulation (AAI) in the sick sinus syndrome].
Goicolea de Oro A; Chicote R; López-Gil M; Márquez L; Botella M; García-Cosío F
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990; 43 Suppl 2():52-7. PubMed ID: 2236799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Left atrial size and wall motion in patients with permanent ventricular and atrial pacing.
Kubica J; Stolarczyk L; Krzyminska E; Krasowski R; Raczak G; Lubiński A; Stanke A; Swiatecka G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1737-41. PubMed ID: 1704533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing.
Kato M; Dote K; Sasaki S; Goto K; Takemoto H; Habara S; Hasegawa D; Matsuda O
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 16176525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Contribution of atrial contraction to left ventricular filling in patients with sick sinus syndrome on AAI pacing.
Mohan JC; Bajaj V; Sethi KK; Arora R
Int J Cardiol; 1990 Aug; 28(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 2394524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome.
Andersen HR; Thuesen L; Bagger JP; Vesterlund T; Thomsen PE
Lancet; 1994 Dec; 344(8936):1523-8. PubMed ID: 7983951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise test of DDDR versus DDD pacing.
Capucci A; Boriani G; Specchia S; Marinelli M; Santarelli A; Magnani B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1908-13. PubMed ID: 1279570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up.
Kuniewicz M; Rydlewska A; Karkowski G; Lelakowska-Pieła M; Majewski J; Lelakowski J
Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 25001847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Benefit of atrial pacing in sleep apnea syndrome.
Garrigue S; Bordier P; Jaïs P; Shah DC; Hocini M; Raherison C; Tunon De Lara M; Haïssaguerre M; Clementy J
N Engl J Med; 2002 Feb; 346(6):404-12. PubMed ID: 11832528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of pacing modes on cardiac baroreflex function in permanently paced patients with sinus node dysfunction.
Tsurugi T; Abe H; Oginosawa Y; Kohno R; Yasumasu T; Nagatomo T; Otsuji Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 18284495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Heart failure in patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with single lead atrial or dual-chamber pacing: no association with pacing mode or right ventricular pacing site.
Riahi S; Nielsen JC; Hjortshøj S; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Dalsgaard D; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Europace; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1475-82. PubMed ID: 22447958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Atrioventricular conduction and permanent atrial pacing].
Medzevicius A; Medzeviciene V
Medicina (Kaunas); 2002; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12474716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of effects of propranolol versus pindolol on sinus rate and pacing frequency in sick sinus syndrome.
Strickberger SA; Fish RD; Lamas GA; Cantillon C; Bhatia S; McGowan N; Antman EM; Friedman PL
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8420236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Atrial demand pacing in patients with symptomatic sick sinus syndrome.
Lee WL; Kong CW; Wang JJ; Chen WL; Wang SP; Chang MS
Jpn Heart J; 1994 Sep; 35(5):625-33. PubMed ID: 7830327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Feasibility and safety of long-term AAI(R) pacing in isolated sinus node syndrome].
Körber T; Voss W; Ismer B; Weber F; Nienaber CA; von Knorre GH
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 17(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16547656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The influence of permanent cardiac pacing on plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Sadowski M; Wozakowska-Kapłon B
Cardiol J; 2008; 15(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 18651383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with bradycardia].
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Mizumaki K; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Sasayama S
J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):503-12. PubMed ID: 1339809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
