52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 843572)
1. Quantit analysis: a quantal assay refinement.
Copenhaver TW; Mielke PW
Biometrics; 1977 Mar; 33(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 843572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose response curves.
Prentice RL
Biometrics; 1976 Dec; 32(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 1009225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trimmed logit method for estimating the ED50 in quantal bioassay.
Sanathanan LP; Gade ET; Shipkowitz NL
Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 3427167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-parametric interval estimation of relative potency for dilution assays, including the case of non-monotone dosage response curves.
Mantel N; Schneiderman MA
Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):619-32. PubMed ID: 1174621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I. Data analysis.
Taswell C
J Immunol; 1981 Apr; 126(4):1614-9. PubMed ID: 7009746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
Potter DM
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A statistical test of compatibility of data sets to a common dose-response model.
Stiteler WM; Knauf LA; Hertzberg RC; Schoeny RS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 8128001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A general noninteractive multiple toxicity model including probit, logit, and Weibull transformations.
Christensen ER; Chen CY
Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):711-25. PubMed ID: 4074820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The logistic transform for bounded outcome scores.
Lesaffre E; Rizopoulos D; Tsonaka R
Biostatistics; 2007 Jan; 8(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 16597671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum likelihood estimation for a special type of grouped data with an application to a dose-response problem.
Fryer JG; Pethybridge RJ
Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 1174622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum likelihood vs. minimum chi-square.
Mantel N
Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 4074827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interval estimation of the LD50 based on an up-and-down experiment.
Choi SC
Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 2364133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interval estimation of the mean response in a log-regression model.
Wu J; Wong AC; Wei W
Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2125-35. PubMed ID: 16220472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coding with noisy neurons: stability of tuning curve estimation strongly depends on the analysis method.
Etzold A; Schwegler H; Eurich CW
J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Apr; 134(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 15003377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.
Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parametric bootstrap for testing model fitting in the proportional hazards framework: an application to the survival analysis of Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves.
Casellas J; Tarrés J; Piedrafita J; Varona L
J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2609-16. PubMed ID: 16971560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose.
Malkin RA; Burdick DS; Johnson EE; Pilkington TC; Swanson DK; Ideker RE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 8335329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pilot study of a hierarchical Bayes method for utility estimation in a choice-based conjoint analysis of prescription benefit plans including medication therapy management services.
Wellman GS; Vidican C
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Sep; 4(3):218-30. PubMed ID: 18794033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
