495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8436001)
1. A clinical comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethindrone: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.
Masson S; Franssen E; Hilditch JR; Powell MG
Contraception; 1993 Jan; 47(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8436001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the clinical performance of three triphasic oral contraceptives: a multicenter, randomized comparative trial.
Schilling LH; Bolding OT; Chenault CB; Chong AP; Fleury F; Forrest K; Glick HI; Hasson HM; Heil CG; London RS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 2):1264-8. PubMed ID: 2655451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of contraceptive acceptability of levonorgestrel and ethinyl oestradiol administered in one three-phasic (Trionetta) and one monophasic (Neovletta) version.
Carlborg L
Contraception; 1983 May; 27(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 6349925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A two-year clinical study of the effects of two triphasic oral contraceptives on plasma lipids.
Kakis G; Powell M; Marshall A; Woutersz TB; Steiner G
Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1994; 39(5):283-91. PubMed ID: 7820162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of cycle control with monophasic levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol 100 micrograms/20 micrograms versus triphasic norethindrone/ethinylestradiol 500-750-1000 micrograms/35 micrograms: a multicenter, randomized, open-label study.
Chavez A; DelConte A
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1999 Jun; 4(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 10427482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized, double-blind study of two combined and two progestogen-only oral contraceptives.
Sheth A; Jain U; Sharma S; Adatia A; Patankar S; Andolsek L; Pretnar-Darovec A; Belsey MA; Hall PE; Parker RA; Ayeni S; Pinol A; Li Hoi Foo C
Contraception; 1982 Mar; 25(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6804162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in coagulation and anticoagulation in women taking low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives: a controlled comparative 12-month clinical trial.
Notelovitz M; Kitchens CS; Khan FY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Nov; 167(5):1255-61. PubMed ID: 1442974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new triphasic oral contraceptive in private practice.
Ellsworth HS; Ayerst RI; Harris JW; Stone RA; Anderson AE; Jones TL; Curtis MK
Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 3102161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experience with a triphasic oral contraceptive ('Trinordiol') in young women.
Gaspard UJ; Deville JL; Dubois M
Curr Med Res Opin; 1983; 8(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 6406157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of some oral contraceptives on serum concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin and ceruloplasmin.
Song S; Chen JK; He ML; Fotherby K
Contraception; 1989 Apr; 39(4):385-99. PubMed ID: 2498034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
Van Vliet H; Grimes D; Helmerhorst F; Schulz K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD003283. PubMed ID: 11687185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference period analysis of vaginal bleeding with triphasic oral contraceptive agents containing norethindrone or levonorgestrel: a comparison study.
Schwarz BE; Pierce C; Walden CE; Knopp RH
Int J Fertil; 1992; 37(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 1355765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD003283. PubMed ID: 12804457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and either 30 micrograms or 20 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol.
Akerlund M; Røde A; Westergaard J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Sep; 100(9):832-8. PubMed ID: 8218004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.
Godsland IF; Crook D; Simpson R; Proudler T; Felton C; Lees B; Anyaoku V; Devenport M; Wynn V
N Engl J Med; 1990 Nov; 323(20):1375-81. PubMed ID: 2146499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter, uncontrolled clinical investigation of the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel over six treatment cycles.
Bannemerschult R; Hanker JP; Wünsch C; Fox P; Albring M; Brill K
Contraception; 1997 Nov; 56(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 9437556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical and biological justifications for the use of Triella].
McGuire JL; Pasquale SA; Castaigne JP
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Dec; 81(12):731-6. PubMed ID: 3823727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lipid and biochemical changes after low-dose oral contraception.
Loke DF; Ng CS; Holck S; Hall PE; Ratnam SS
Contraception; 1992 Sep; 46(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 1451519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative contraceptive efficacy and mechanism of action of the norgestimate-containing triphasic oral contraceptive.
London RS; Chapdelaine A; Upmalis D; Olson W; Smith J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1992; 156():9-14. PubMed ID: 1324557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial of three oral contraceptives: comparison of bleeding patterns by contraceptive types and steroid levels.
Saleh WA; Burkman RT; Zacur HA; Kimball AW; Kwiterovich P; Bell WK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1740-5; discussion 1745-7. PubMed ID: 8317516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
