181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8436087)
1. A comparison of close proximity concentric and modified single fiber electromyographic recordings from extensor digitorum communis.
Harmon RL; Rodriquez AA; Harmon PA
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 33(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 8436087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Close-proximity concentric and modified single fiber electromyographic recordings using revised techniques with a paired wire electrode.
Harmon RL; Rodriquez AA
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994; 34(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 7956876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV; Andreassen S
Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concentric macro electromyography.
Jabre JF
Muscle Nerve; 1991 Sep; 14(9):820-5. PubMed ID: 1922175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recording characteristics of monopolar EMG electrodes.
Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2000101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles.
Chan RC; Hsu TC
Muscle Nerve; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1028-32. PubMed ID: 1944402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive?
Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
Muscle Nerve; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1554-60. PubMed ID: 8941269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis.
Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ
Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single fiber macro versus concentric trigger macro EMG: a comparison of methods.
Nix WA; Scherer A
Muscle Nerve; 1992 Feb; 15(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 1549140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part I. Normal subjects.
Bauermeister W; Jabre JF
Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1406764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Areas of low-threshold motor units in the m. extensor digitorum communis--study using concentric needle electrodes].
Böhle A; Thiele B
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Mar; 15(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 6426932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part II: Activity, upper centile amplitude, and number of small segments.
Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
Muscle Nerve; 1986; 9(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 3736582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The spectrum of concentric macro EMG correlations. Part II. Patients with diseases of muscle and nerve.
Gan R; Jabre JF
Muscle Nerve; 1992 Oct; 15(10):1085-8. PubMed ID: 1406765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: Turns and amplitude measurements.
Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
Muscle Nerve; 1986 Jun; 9(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 3724788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recording and physical characteristics of disposable concentric needle EMG electrodes.
Nandedkar SD; Tedman B; Sanders DB
Muscle Nerve; 1990 Oct; 13(10):909-14. PubMed ID: 2233847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeated single fiber recordings do not affect the jitter and the fiber density.
Straube A; Garner CG; Witt TN
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994; 34(7):387-90. PubMed ID: 7859665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cancellation on triggered averaging used to determine synchronization between motor unit discharge in separate muscles.
Poulsen P; Svendsen JH; Tucker K; Graven-Nielsen T; Hodges PW
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Aug; 182(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19406151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jitter analysis utilizing a high speed FM tape recorder.
Nazliel B; Kuruoğlu R
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 40(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 11039117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Principal component analysis of the features of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
Muscle Nerve; 1989 Apr; 12(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 2770781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
