These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8436194)

  • 1. A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR Index and Summers' Occlusal Index.
    Buchanan IB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; O'Brien KD; Andrews M
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 8436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The first 100 cases of orthodontic treatment: one year out of retention.
    Fox NA; Chadwick SC
    Dent Update; 1994 Sep; 21(7):288-92, 294-7. PubMed ID: 7875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
    DeGuzman L; Bahiraei D; Vig KW; Vig PS; Weyant RJ; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 7847276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
    Mayers M; Firestone AR; Rashid R; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 16214623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pilot study to assess the validity of the Orthodontic Treatment Priority Index in English schoolchildren.
    Scivier GA; Menezes DM; Parker CD
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1974; 2(5):246-52. PubMed ID: 4529674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability in recording and grading the need for orthodontic treatment using the handicapping malocclusion assessment record, occlusal index and dental aesthetic index.
    Otuyemi OD; Noar JH
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Jun; 24(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 8871024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.
    Hamdan AM; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 10327742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents.
    Robb SI; Sadowsky C; Schneider BJ; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 9790321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between centric relation–maximum intercuspation discrepancy and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
    He SS; Deng X; Wamalwa P; Chen S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Nov; 68(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 20942605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An introduction to indices of malocclusion.
    McGuinness NJ; Stephens CD
    Dent Update; 1994 May; 21(4):140-4. PubMed ID: 7867863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal contact changes with removable and bonded retainers in a 1-year retention period.
    Sari Z; Uysal T; Başçiftçi FA; Inan O
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):867-72. PubMed ID: 19705947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index outcomes for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.
    Ponduri S; Pringle A; Illing H; Brennan PA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 49(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 20451309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insights into occlusal problems through the use of centric relation procedures. Part two.
    Carlson GL
    Northwest Dent; 2007; 86(2):31-4, 37, 39 passim. PubMed ID: 17479703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics.
    Roberts CT; Richmond S
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 9218112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporomandibular pain-dysfunction and occlusal relationships.
    Roth RH
    Angle Orthod; 1973 Apr; 43(2):136-53. PubMed ID: 4511992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of functional occlusal interferences in orthodontically treated and untreated subjects.
    Rinchuse DJ; Sassouni V
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 6576651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity.
    Richmond S; Shaw WC; O'Brien KD; Buchanan IB; Jones R; Stephens CD; Roberts CT; Andrews M
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 1582457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional occlusion: II. The role of articulators in orthodontics.
    Clark JR; Hutchinson I; Sandy JR
    J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 11395534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occlusion and condylar position.
    Roth RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 7879765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.