These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8436196)

  • 1. Class III malocclusion: the post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 8436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Class III malocclusion: a comparison of extraction and non-extraction techniques.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Jun; 13(3):212-22. PubMed ID: 1936140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of the effects of customized facemask therapy or headgear to the lower arch on the developing Class III face.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):467-82. PubMed ID: 8682163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chincap appliance.
    Allen RA; Connolly IH; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8223971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Kwak HJ; Park HJ; Kim YJ; Lee DY
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 29131663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan PW; Hagg U; Yiu C; Wei SH
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 9573887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup.
    Ferro A; Nucci LP; Ferro F; Gallo C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 12695770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of successful chincup therapy in skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Ko YI; Baek SH; Mah J; Yang WS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 15224056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 15224054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Erverdi N; Ozkan G
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.