These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The assessment of developmentally disabled children with the WISC-R, Binet and other tests. Raskin LM; Bloom AS; Klee SH; Reese A J Clin Psychol; 1978 Jan; 34(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 76637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Educational and psychological assessment of children with learning disorders. Taylor RL; Warren SA Pediatr Clin North Am; 1984 Apr; 31(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 6728518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale. Atkinson L Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical evaluation of school difficulties. Menkes JH Neuropadiatrie; 1974 Aug; 5(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 4612405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting the handicapped infants in Hong Kong. Baber FM Mod Med Asia; 1977 Nov; 13(11):11-5. PubMed ID: 74796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability. Bloom AS; Allard AM; Zelko FA; Brill WJ; Topinka CW; Pfohl W Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationships among scores on infant tests for children with developmental problems. Erickson MT; Johnson NM; Campbell FA Am J Ment Defic; 1970 Jul; 75(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 4193621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disparities in mentally retarded persons' IQs derived from different intelligence tests. Spitz HH Am J Ment Defic; 1986 Mar; 90(5):588-91. PubMed ID: 3953693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-Binet. Goldstein DJ; Sheaffer CI Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Jan; 92(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 3342140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cost analysis approach to optimizing test selection. Wendler CL; Roid GH J Learn Disabil; 1984; 17(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 6434677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children. Hollinger CL; Baldwin C Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 1696017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychological assessment of the mentally handicapped. 3. Assessment for learning. Hegarty JR Nurs Mirror Midwives J; 1976 Oct; 143(16):64-6. PubMed ID: 1049932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of assessment tests in the stability of intelligence scoring of pre-school children with uneven/delayed cognitive profile. Yang P; Jong YJ; Hsu HY; Lung FW J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 May; 55(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 21375639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent validity of the Quick Test, the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, and the WISC-R for a sample of special education students. Vance B Psychol Rep; 1988 Apr; 62(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3406260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a test battery (NPM-X) for neuropsychological and neuromotor examination of children with developmental disabilities or mental retardation. A theoretical and clinical study. Gjaerum B Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 1997; 390():1-55. PubMed ID: 9212855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The measure of child. Levine MD Pediatrics; 1985 Apr; 75(4):791-2. PubMed ID: 2580264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Construct validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with mildly mentally retarded students. Obrzut A; Nelson RB; Obrzut JE Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jul; 92(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3618659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and neurodevelopmental profile of young children with autism. Singhi P; Malhi P Indian Pediatr; 2001 Apr; 38(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 11313510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]