These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8437734)

  • 1. Compatibility of army face paint and insect repellent formulation.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC
    Mil Med; 1993 Jan; 158(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 8437734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of efficacy and duration of the stick camouflage face paint with 30% deet against mosquitoes in Belize.
    Lawrence KL; Benante JP; Close NC; Achee NL
    US Army Med Dep J; 2009; ():84-90. PubMed ID: 20084741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soldier acceptability of a camouflage face paint combined with DEET insect repellent.
    Debboun M; Coleman RE; Sithiprasasna R; Gupta RK; Strickman D
    Mil Med; 2001 Sep; 166(9):777-82. PubMed ID: 11569440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of a new repellent camouflage face paint.
    Hoch AL; Gupta RK; Weyandt TB
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1995 Jun; 11(2 Pt 1):172-5. PubMed ID: 7595441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlled release repellent formulations on human volunteers under three climatic regimens.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1991 Sep; 7(3):490-3. PubMed ID: 1791462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field-user acceptability evaluation of a new stick camouflage face paint formulation with and without the insect repellent DEET.
    Lawrence KL; Benante JP; Close NC
    Mil Med; 2012 Nov; 177(11):1322-7. PubMed ID: 23198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluation of face paint repellent formulation using human volunteers under three climatic regimens.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC; Frommer RL
    J Med Entomol; 1989 Sep; 26(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 2795618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field-user acceptability of new camouflage face paint formulations in the Republic of Korea.
    Debboun M; Burge R; Klun JA; Lee HC; Kim HC; Klein TA
    Mil Med; 2005 Oct; 170(10):831-5. PubMed ID: 16435753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Observation on the effectiveness of repellent coating against mosquitoes].
    Jiang ZK; Zhao XZ; Liu DP; Ma Y
    Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 1992; 10(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 1307278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory evaluation of controlled-release repellent formulations on human volunteers under three climatic regimens.
    Gupta RK; Rutledge LC
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2565368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and characterization of micellar systems for application as insect repellents.
    Barradas TN; Lopes LM; Ricci-Júnior E; de Holanda E Silva KG; Mansur CR
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Oct; 454(2):633-40. PubMed ID: 23732393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field efficacy of four insect repellent products against vector mosquitoes in a tropical environment.
    Yap HH; Jahangir K; Zairi J
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2000 Sep; 16(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 11081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insect repellents and sunscreen: implications for personal protection strategies against mosquito-borne disease.
    Webb CE; Russell RC
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 33(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 19811489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repellency of two controlled-release formulations of deet against Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Aedes taeniorhynchus mosquitoes.
    Schreck CE; Kline DL
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 2708995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in insect repellent formulations: A review.
    Tavares M; da Silva MRM; de Oliveira de Siqueira LB; Rodrigues RAS; Bodjolle-d'Almeida L; Dos Santos EP; Ricci-Júnior E
    Int J Pharm; 2018 Mar; 539(1-2):190-209. PubMed ID: 29410208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception and use of insect repellent among soldiers in the Singapore Armed Forces.
    Fai FY; Lee L
    Mil Med; 1996 Feb; 161(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 8857226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of controlled-release personal-use arthropod repellents and permethrin-impregnated clothing in the field.
    Gupta RK; Sweeney AW; Rutledge LC; Cooper RD; Frances SP; Westrom DR
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1987 Dec; 3(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 2904965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repellents and other personal protection strategies against Aedes albopictus.
    Schreck CE; McGovern TP
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Jun; 5(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 2746209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of skin abrasions on the efficacy of the repellent deet against Aedes aegypti.
    Rueda LM; Rutledge LC; Gupta RK
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Jun; 14(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 9673919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.
    Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.