396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8437788)
1. Flow cytometric evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer.
Connor JP; Miller DS; Bauer KD; Murad TM; Rademaker AW; Lurain JR
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 8437788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of early stage adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Magtibay PM; Perrone JF; Stanhope CR; Katzmann JA; Keeney GL; Li H
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Nov; 75(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 10525380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow-cytometric DNA analysis of early stage adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Magtibay PM; Perrone JF; Stanhope CR; Katzmann JA; Keeney GL; Li H
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Oct; 75(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10502420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow cytometry in cervical adenocarcinoma. Correlating DNA content analysis with the clinical picture.
Kaspar HG; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV
J Reprod Med; 1997 Mar; 42(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 9109087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of cirrhotic liver cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can provide a new prognostic factor.
Ruà S; Comino A; Fruttero A; Torchio P; Bouzari H; Taraglio S; Torchio B; Capussotti L
Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1195-202. PubMed ID: 8826940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA ploidy and proliferation heterogeneity in human prostate cancers.
Shankey TV; Jin JK; Dougherty S; Flanigan RC; Graham S; Pyle JM
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 21(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 8529468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA ploidy, proliferation index, grade, and stage as prognostic factors for vulvar squamous cell carcinomas.
Dolan JR; McCall AR; Gooneratne S; Walter S; Lansky DM
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 8428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of DNA index as a prognostic factor in early cervical carcinoma.
Nguyen HN; Sevin BU; Averette HE; Ganjei P; Perras J; Ramos R; Angioli R; Donato D; Penalver M
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 8349165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA content as prognostic factor in cervix carcinoma stage IB-III treated with radiotherapy.
Lutgens LC; Schutte B; de Jong JM; Thunnissen FB
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Sep; 54(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 8088604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic implications of proliferative activity and DNA aneuploidy in Astler-Coller Dukes stage C colonic adenocarcinomas.
Harlow SP; Eriksen BL; Poggensee L; Chmiel JS; Scarpelli DG; Murad T; Bauer KD
Cancer Res; 1991 May; 51(9):2403-9. PubMed ID: 2015602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A DNA cytometric proliferation index improves the value of the DNA ploidy pattern as a prognosticating tool in patients with carcinoma of the prostate.
Ahlgren G; Lindholm K; Falkmer U; Abrahamsson PA
Urology; 1997 Sep; 50(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 9301701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction in ovarian cancer determined by flow cytometry following detection of cytokeratin-labeled tumor cells.
Kimmig R; Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Caspari C; Hepp H
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11748971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in endometrial cancer stage I and II: a prospective 5-year survival study.
Friberg LG; Norén H; Delle U
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8175025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA content of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an independent prognostic indicator.
Hsu MM; Chiou CR; Ko JY; Sheen TS; Hong RL; Ting LL
Cancer Detect Prev; 2000; 24(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10917131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are increased tumor aneuploidy and heightened cell proliferation along with heterogeneity associated with patient outcome for carcinomas of the uterine cervix? A combined analysis of subjects treated in RTOG 9001 and a single-institution trial.
Wolfson AH; Winter K; Crook W; Krishan A; Grigsby PW; Markoe AM; Morris M; Gaffney DK; Eifel PJ; Lucci JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 17919835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA ploidy, proliferative index, and epidermal growth factor receptor: expression and prognosis in patients with gastric cancers.
D'Agnano I; D'Angelo C; Savarese A; Carlini M; Garofalo A; Bottari L; Santoro E; Giannarelli D; Vecchione A; Zupi G
Lab Invest; 1995 Apr; 72(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 7723282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow cytometry and interactive image cytometry in endometrial carcinoma. A comparative and prognostic study.
Strang P; Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Stendahl U; Valdes del Campo M; Tribukait B
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(2):783-8. PubMed ID: 2064334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions in normal and dysplastic cervical lesions: correlation with DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by flow cytometry.
Singh M; Prasad S; Kalra N; Singh U; Shukla Y
Oncology; 2006; 71(5-6):411-6. PubMed ID: 17785995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of clinicopathologic and deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometric variables in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the modern era.
Clark PE; Veys JA; Eskridge MR; Woodruff RD; Hall MC
Urol Oncol; 2005; 23(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 16144666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
