BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8438370)

  • 1. Human antiporcine mixed lymphocyte reaction.
    Li RA; Kirk AD; Abernathy KA; Bollinger RR
    Transplant Proc; 1993 Feb; 25(1 Pt 1):442-3. PubMed ID: 8438370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Xenogeneic cellular response of human lymphocytes to porcine lymphocytes and isolated porcine pancreatic islets.
    Heiser A; Ulrichs K; Eckstein V; Müller-Ruchholtz W
    Transplant Proc; 1992 Dec; 24(6):2881-2. PubMed ID: 1465982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The human antiporcine cellular repertoire. In vitro studies of acquired and innate cellular responsiveness.
    Kirk AD; Li RA; Kinch MS; Abernethy KA; Doyle C; Bollinger RR
    Transplantation; 1993 Apr; 55(4):924-31. PubMed ID: 8475569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of activated natural killer and CD4+, CD8+ cells in the cellular rejection of a discordant xenograft.
    Elsen M; Soares M; Latinne D; Cornet A; Bazin H
    Transplant Proc; 1993 Feb; 25(1 Pt 1):447-9. PubMed ID: 8438373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cellular immune reactivity in xenogenic "human-anti-pig" transplant combination].
    Herrlinger K; Eckstein V; Westphal E; Hamelmann W; Thiede A; Ulrichs K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123(7):803-8. PubMed ID: 9746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histocompatibility matching between humans and baboons.
    Neethling FA; Nortman PJ; Cooper DK
    Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):1067-9. PubMed ID: 2140915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cyclosporine inhibits interleukin-2 production during human cellular immune response to pig antigens.
    Pozzetto U; Citterio F; Fioravanti G; Tassoni S; Serino F; Caizzi MP; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 1994 Oct; 26(5):2869-70. PubMed ID: 7940906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of human xenogeneic and allogeneic proliferative cellular immune responses using serum-free media.
    Saetre AM; Lillevang ST; Kemp E; Kristensen T
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Apr; 28(2):656-7. PubMed ID: 8623329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of human chimerism and functional suppressor cells in fetal pigs: feasibility of surrogate tolerogenesis for xenotransplantation.
    Beschorner WE; Qian Z; Mattei P; Hess AD; Colombani PM; Sciscione AC; Khouzami A; Blakemore KJ; Burdick JF
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Apr; 28(2):648-9. PubMed ID: 8623323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Devising murine models to better adapt clinical protocols: sequential low-dose treatment with anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies to prevent fully mismatched allograft rejection.
    Campos HH; Bach JF; Chatenoud L
    Transplant Proc; 1993 Feb; 25(1 Pt 1):798-9. PubMed ID: 8438486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Xenogeneic thymokidney and thymic tissue transplantation in a pig-to-baboon model: I. Evidence for pig-specific T-cell unresponsiveness.
    Barth RN; Yamamoto S; LaMattina JC; Kumagai N; Kitamura H; Vagefi PA; Awwad M; Colvin RB; Cooper DK; Sykes M; Sachs DH; Yamada K
    Transplantation; 2003 May; 75(10):1615-24. PubMed ID: 12777846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of cell-mediated immune responses in rejection of concordant heart xenografts in primates.
    Shah AS; Itescu S; O'Hair DP; Tugulea S; Kwiatkowski PA; Liu Z; Platt JL; Rose EA; Suciu-Foca N; Michler RE
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Apr; 28(2):775-6. PubMed ID: 8623396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro analysis of the human antiporcine T-cell repertoire.
    Kirk AD; Hall BL; Finn OJ; Bollinger RR
    Transplant Proc; 1992 Apr; 24(2):602-3. PubMed ID: 1533074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oligoclonal V beta usage in vitro after in vivo exposure to pig xenoantigen extracorporeal pig liver perfusion.
    Fair JH; Mattei P; Guo YP; Ratner L; Klein A; Burdick JF; Kittur D
    Transplant Proc; 1994 Jun; 26(3):1340-1. PubMed ID: 8029932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phenotype of infiltrating cells in an ex vivo model of human antiporcine hyperacute cardiac xenograft rejection.
    Ibrahim S; Kirk AD; Sanfilippo F
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Apr; 28(2):777. PubMed ID: 8623397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed porcine epidermal cell-human lymphocyte and porcine-human lymphocyte culture. Studies on intermingled transplantation of fresh porcine and human skin.
    Li YY; Wei QM; Yang ZJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1983 Sep; 96(9):698-700. PubMed ID: 6228396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. T-cell responses during pig-to-primate xenotransplantation.
    Davila E; Byrne GW; LaBreche PT; McGregor HC; Schwab AK; Davies WR; Rao VP; Oi K; Tazelaar HD; Logan JS; McGregor CG
    Xenotransplantation; 2006 Jan; 13(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 16497210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Immunological diagnosis of the kidney allograft rejection reaction].
    Drannik GN
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1981; (5):64-71. PubMed ID: 6458144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current cellular immunological hurdles in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation.
    Le Bas-Bernardet S; Blancho G
    Transpl Immunol; 2009 Jun; 21(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 18952170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immunobiology of discordant xenograft rejection and potential therapeutic modalities.
    Robson SC; Candinas D; Winkler H; Kopp C; Hancock WW; Bach FH
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Jun; 28(3):1154-5. PubMed ID: 8658607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.