These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of thermal injury zones in loop electrical and laser cervical excisional conization. Baggish MS; Barash F; Noel Y; Brooks M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 1536226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between laser excisional conization and laser vaporization for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Baggish MS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 3728604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: experience with the low-voltage diathermy loop. Whiteley PF; Oláh KS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 May; 162(5):1272-7. PubMed ID: 2339728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which is more painful? A randomized trial comparing loop with laser excision of the cervical transformation zone. Crompton AC; Johnson N Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Mar; 52(3):392-4. PubMed ID: 8157197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thermal tissue damage following laser and large loop conization of the cervix. Paraskevaidis E; Kitchener HC; Malamou-Mitsi V; Agnanti N; Lolis D Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Nov; 84(5):752-4. PubMed ID: 7936506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser vaporization versus laser excision conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Partington CK; Turner MJ; Soutter WP; Griffiths M; Krausz T Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):775-9. PubMed ID: 2649822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Loop electrocautery excisional procedure: therapeutic effectiveness as an ablation and a conization equivalent. Gold M; Dunton CJ; Murray J; Macones G; Hanau C; Carlson JA Gynecol Oncol; 1996 May; 61(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 8626140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal cervical smears. Luesley DM; Cullimore J; Redman CW; Lawton FG; Emens JM; Rollason TP; Williams DR; Buxton EJ BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6741):1690-3. PubMed ID: 2264855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. Keijser KG; Kenemans P; van der Zanden PH; Schijf CP; Vooijs GP; Rolland R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1281-7. PubMed ID: 1566785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needle excision of the transformation zone: A new method for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Sadek AL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 182(4):866-71. PubMed ID: 10764464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CO2 laser surgery for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Excisional, destructive and combined techniques. Penna C; Fallani MG; Fambrini M; Zipoli E; Marchionni M J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):913-8. PubMed ID: 12497680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Dorsey JH Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1991 Sep; 18(3):475-89. PubMed ID: 1956665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]