These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8439150)

  • 1. Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling.
    Buttner MP; Stetzenbach LD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1993 Jan; 59(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 8439150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of two aerosolization methods on the release of fungal propagules from a contaminated agar surface.
    Górny RL; Ławniczek-Wałczyk A
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2012; 19(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 22742802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the aerosolization potential for fungal spores in moldy homes.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 15500633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices.
    Godish D; Godish T
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.
    Bellin P; Schillinger J
    Indoor Air; 2001 Mar; 11(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11235232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring and assessment of airborne fungi in Kolkata, India, by viable and non-viable air sampling methods.
    Das S; Gupta-Bhattacharya S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Aug; 184(8):4671-84. PubMed ID: 21915605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between indoor and outdoor bio-aerosols collected with a button inhalable aerosol sampler in urban homes.
    Lee T; Grinshpun SA; Martuzevicius D; Adhikari A; Crawford CM; Luo J; Reponen T
    Indoor Air; 2006 Feb; 16(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16420496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
    Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
    Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols.
    Han T; Nazarenko Y; Lioy PJ; Mainelis G
    Indoor Air; 2011 Apr; 21(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 21204982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores.
    Aizenberg V; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 11192220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Typical levels of airborne fungal spores in houses without obvious moisture problems during a rainy season in Florida, USA.
    Codina R; Fox RW; Lockey RF; DeMarco P; Bagg A
    J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2008; 18(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 18564625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.
    Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of sampling height on the concentration of airborne fungal spores.
    Khattab A; Levetin E
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2008 Nov; 101(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 19055208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of human exposure to airborne fungi in agricultural confinements: personal inhalable sampling versus stationary sampling.
    Adhikari A; Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2004; 11(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 15627336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aeromycological profile of indoor and outdoor environments.
    Oliveira M; Ribeiro H; Delgado JL; Abreu I
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Jul; 11(7):1360-7. PubMed ID: 20449225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.