These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8441927)

  • 1. Assessing extracranial carotid stenosis: magnetic resonance angiography, duplex scanning, and digital angiography.
    Freeman J; Free T; Payne H; Gutnik L; Schultz G; Masterson T; Brewer M
    S D J Med; 1993 Feb; 46(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 8441927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Young GR; Humphrey PR; Shaw MD; Nixon TE; Smith ET
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 57(12):1466-78. PubMed ID: 7798975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carotid bifurcation stenosis: a comparative study between MR angiography and duplex scanning with respect to digital subtraction angiography.
    Carriero A; Ucchino S; Magarelli N; Legnini M; Macrì MA; Napolitano AM; Bonomo L
    J Neuroradiol; 1995 Jun; 22(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 7629567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colour duplex flow imaging in carotid arterial disease: correlation with intra-arterial digital angiography.
    Todman DH; Hewson DJ; Seneviratne B; Walsh P
    Clin Exp Neurol; 1991; 28():66-70. PubMed ID: 1821841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery].
    Kramer J; Wimberger D; Haimberger K; Marosi L; Schurawitzki H; Stiglbauer R; Imhof H
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(7):194-9. PubMed ID: 8465524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications of duplex carotid imaging. A case report.
    Dick MT; Cape CA
    Angiology; 1994 Mar; 45(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 8129206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the extracranial carotid arteries: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography.
    Mattle HP; Kent KC; Edelman RR; Atkinson DJ; Skillman JJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1991 Jun; 13(6):838-44; discussion 844-5. PubMed ID: 2038105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable?].
    Aschenbach R; Eger C; Basche S; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2004 Mar; 176(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 15026949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
    Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quantification of extracranial carotid stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography and Doppler sonography versus intra-arterial angiography].
    Fürst G; Kahn T; Sitzer M; Fischer H; Hofer M; Fehlings T; Aulich A; Steinmetz H
    Rofo; 1993 Oct; 159(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 8219124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates.
    Turnipseed WD; Kennell TW; Turski PA; Acher CW; Hoch JR
    Surgery; 1993 Oct; 114(4):643-8; discussion 648-9. PubMed ID: 8211677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Diagnosis of extracranial carotid stenosis].
    Hamann GF
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1998 Sep; 123(37):1075-80. PubMed ID: 9762052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
    Spartera C; Morettini G; Marino G; Marsili L; Di Cesare E; La Barbera G; Petrassi C; Ventura M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Magnetic resonance angiography in occlusive/stenotic pathology of the intra and extracranial cerebral vessels].
    Carella A; D'Aprile P; Medicamento N
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1992; 14(4-6):387-97. PubMed ID: 1293982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis.
    Sitzer M; Fürst G; Fischer H; Siebler M; Fehlings T; Kleinschmidt A; Kahn T; Steinmetz H
    Stroke; 1993 Oct; 24(10):1513-8. PubMed ID: 8378955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carotid duplex scan versus angiography in evaluation of carotid artery disease.
    Fontenelle LJ; Simper SC; Hanson TL
    Am Surg; 1994 Nov; 60(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 7978683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Goyal M; Nicol J; Gandhi D
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2004 Apr; 55(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15131933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference?
    Maldonado TS
    Semin Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 20(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 18082837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.