138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8442808)
1. Cytobrush versus swab endocervical sampling for the detection of obstetric chlamydial infection.
Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC
Am J Perinatol; 1993 Jan; 10(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8442808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Dacron-tipped applicator and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infections.
Weiland TL; Noller KL; Smith TF; Ory SJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Nov; 26(11):2437-8. PubMed ID: 2976774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of chlamydial infection in pregnant women using the Testpack Chlamydia diagnostic kit.
Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):801-3. PubMed ID: 2014100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enzyme immunoassay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in diverse patient groups.
Bakir TM; Hossain A; De-Silva S; Siddiqui A; Sengupta BS; el-Sheikh MM; Bakir AF
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1989; 33(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 2671155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathfinder direct fluorescent antigen test for diagnosing maternal chlamydial infections. An evaluation.
Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1992 Feb; 37(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 1538363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of genitourinary tract Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women by ligase chain reaction assay.
Andrews WW; Lee HH; Roden WJ; Mott CW
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 9083312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C
Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple site sampling does not increase the sensitivity of Chlamydia trachomatis detection in infertility patients.
Dietrich W; Rath M; Stanek G; Apfalter P; Huber JC; Tempfer C
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 18990379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
Wandall DA; Ostergaard L; Overgaard L; Worm AM; Gutschik E
APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the pregnant cervix.
Khurana CM; Deddish PA; delMundo F
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Aug; 66(2):241-3. PubMed ID: 4022486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Search of Chlamydia trachomatis in 159 women from private consultation].
Gorozpe Calvillo JI; Gómez Arzapalo E; Castañeda Vivar JJ; Santoyo Haro S; Herrera Avalos I
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Mar; 73(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 21961349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in early pregnancy using self-administered vaginal swabs and first pass urines: a cross-sectional community-based survey.
Oakeshott P; Hay P; Hay S; Steinke F; Rink E; Thomas B; Oakeley P; Kerry S
Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Oct; 52(483):830-2. PubMed ID: 12392124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Routine screening of gynaecological and obstetric patients for Chlamydia trachomatis.
el-Sheikh MM; Sengupta BS; Bakir TM; Hossain A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 May; 27(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 3314844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical smears from pregnant population.
Maguire NC; Jordan AG; Ehya H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Feb; 114(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 2302038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
