These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8443695)

  • 1. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
    Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. I: Studies in vitro at four centers.
    Eiken P; Bärenholdt O; Bjørn Jensen L; Gram J; Pors Nielsen S
    Bone; 1994; 15(6):667-70. PubMed ID: 7873295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. II: Studies in vivo.
    Eiken P; Kolthoff N; Bärenholdt O; Hermansen F; Pors Nielsen S
    Bone; 1994; 15(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 7873296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-Calibrated Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanners Demonstrate Systematic Bias in Pediatric and Young Adult Females.
    Dowthwaite JN; Dunsmore KA; Wang D; Rosenbaum PF; Scerpella TA
    J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 28258886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
    Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
    Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
    Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
    Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
    Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
    Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Follow-up of individual patients on two DXA scanners of the same manufacturer.
    Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 11095175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).
    Mas ID; Biscardi A; Ripamonti U
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 12357069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
    Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Hologic QDR-1000/W and 4500W DXA Scanners in 13- to 18-Year Olds.
    Litaker MS; Barbeau P; Humphries MC; Gutin B
    Obes Res; 2003 Dec; 11(12):1545-52. PubMed ID: 14694220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.
    Faulkner KG; Genant HK; McClung M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Jan; 56(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 7796342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Griffiths M; Bhalerao N; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA; Freund J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Dec; 12(12):2113-8. PubMed ID: 9421245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
    Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.