These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones. Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise. Zwislocki JJ; Jordan HN J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 3958318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Filion PR J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 2754103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds. Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensity resolution and loudness in broadband noise. Schlauch RS; Harvey S; Lanthier N J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1895-902. PubMed ID: 7593914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity discrimination as the driving force for loudness. Application to pure tones in quiet. Hellman WS; Hellman RP J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1255-65. PubMed ID: 2324392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A test of the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis for tones. Marozeau J; Epstein M; Florentine M; Daley B J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3870-7. PubMed ID: 17225414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of first-order approximations for calculations using intensity jnd's. Hellman RP; Hellman WS J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1341-5. PubMed ID: 3782611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate of loudness growth for pure tones in normal and impaired hearing. Hellman RP; Meiselman CH J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):966-75. PubMed ID: 8445131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function. Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Feb; 101(2):669-80. PubMed ID: 9035390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forward- and backward-masked intensity discrimination measured using forced-choice and adjustment procedures. Turner CW; Horwitz AR; Souza PE J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2121-6. PubMed ID: 7963025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions. Epstein M; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):907-13. PubMed ID: 16158646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking. Plack CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1024-30. PubMed ID: 8759955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]