These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8445554)
1. Retentive characteristics of an internally threaded post system. Laurell KA; O'Neilly P J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Mar; 69(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 8445554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. Burns DR; Douglas HB; Moon PC J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Mar; 69(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 8445555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts. Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retentive properties of three post-core systems. Keyf F; Sahin E Aust Dent J; 1994 Feb; 39(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8185535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compressive characteristics of an internally threaded post system. Laurell KA; O'Neilly P; Johnston WM J Prosthodont; 1996 Jun; 5(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 9028213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. Nergiz I; Schmage P; Ozcan M; Platzer U J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11844029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores. Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth. Al-harbi F; Nathanson D J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 14668755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rigidity and retention of root canal posts. Purton DG; Chandler NP; Love RM Br Dent J; 1998 Mar; 184(6):294-6. PubMed ID: 9581367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents. Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tensile dislodgment evaluation of two experimental prefabricated post systems. Lepe X; Bales DJ; Johnson GH Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):209-12. PubMed ID: 9484174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of surface design on retention of dowels cemented with a resin. Standlee JP; Caputo AA J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 8254540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dowel length on the retention of 2 different prefabricated posts. Borer RE; Britto LR; Haddix JE Quintessence Int; 2007 Mar; 38(3):e164-8. PubMed ID: 17510726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. Ruemping DR; Lund MR; Schnell RJ J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Feb; 41(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 366115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. Nergiz I; Schmage P; Platzer U; McMullan-Vogel CG J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 9399186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of design of pre-fabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials. Hochman N; Feinzaig I; Zalkind M J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 12791155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin. Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 11199599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the retentive strength of 3 different posts in restoring badly broken primary maxillary incisors. Gujjar KR; Indushekar KR J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20359425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]