These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8447271)
21. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode. Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR Heart; 2004 Jun; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of implantable sensors for the control of pacemaker mediated tachycardias: a comparative evaluation between minute ventilation sensing and acceleration sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers. Lau CP; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL; Song S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jan; 15(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 1370998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Pacemaker therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation]. Schuchert A; Meinertz T Herz; 1998 Jun; 23(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 9690113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality of life in patients with complete heart block and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of permanent DDIR versus DDDR pacing with mode switch to DDIR. Provenier F; Boudrez H; Deharo JC; Djiane P; Jordaens L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 22(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 10192855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictors and clinical impact of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients treated with dual chamber versus ventricular pacing. Stambler BS; Ellenbogen KA; Orav EJ; Sgarbossa EB; Estes NA; Rizo-Patron C; Kirchhoffer JB; Hadjis TA; Goldman L; Lamas GA; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 26(10):2000-7. PubMed ID: 14516342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rate augmentation and atrial arrhythmias in DDDR pacing. Spencer WH; Markowitz T; Alagona P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1847-51. PubMed ID: 1704552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Mode-switching algorithms: programming and usefulness]. Israel CW Herz; 2001 Feb; 26(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 11258106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Dual-chamber rate-regulated cardiac pacing is aiming toward automatic pacemakers]. Novák M; Psenicka M; Smola M; Bríza J; Cermák S Bratisl Lek Listy; 1997 Nov; 98(11):604-8. PubMed ID: 9525052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA; Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study on the behavior of three different automatic mode switching dual chamber pacemakers to intracardiac recordings of clinical atrial fibrillation. Leung SK; Lau CP; Lam CT; Tse HF; Tang MO; Chung F; Ayers G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 23(12):2086-96. PubMed ID: 11202252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]