These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8447748)

  • 1. Evaluation of baseline-related suprathreshold testing for quick determination of visual field nonprogression.
    Araujo ML; Feuer WJ; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Mar; 111(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 8447748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields?
    Mills RP; Barnebey HS; Migliazzo CV; Li Y
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Sep; 101(9):1596-603. PubMed ID: 8090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry screening for detecting neuro-ophthalmologic disease.
    Siatkowski RM; Lam BL; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Halikman AM
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jun; 103(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 8643246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisampling suprathreshold perimetry: a comparison with conventional suprathreshold and full-threshold strategies by computer simulation.
    Artes PH; Henson DB; Harper R; McLeod D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 44(6):2582-7. PubMed ID: 12766060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; Bates AB; Turpin A; Chauhan BC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 120(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 11831919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?
    Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suprathreshold Approaches to Mapping the Visual Field in Advanced Glaucoma.
    Denniss J; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Jun; 12(6):19. PubMed ID: 37358492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss.
    McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15630403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma.
    de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of diagnostic capabilities of interactive test strategies in automated perimetry.
    Mills RP
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Sep; 92(9):1181-6. PubMed ID: 4058880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural networks to identify glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Lin A; Hoffman D; Gaasterland DE; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12504697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual field progression in glaucoma: estimating the overall significance of deterioration with permutation analyses of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR).
    O'Leary N; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):6776-84. PubMed ID: 22952123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry.
    Meyer DR; Stern JH; Jarvis JM; Lininger LL
    Ophthalmology; 1993 May; 100(5):651-8; discussion 658-9. PubMed ID: 8493006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls.
    Redmond T; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency doubling technology threshold visual field results vary with software version.
    Kojima N; Shirato S; Ohno Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2007; 51(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 18158596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.
    Asman P; Heijl A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Jun; 110(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 1596230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study.
    Topouzis F; Coleman AL; Yu F; Mavroudis L; Anastasopoulos E; Koskosas A; Pappas T; Dimitrakos S; Wilson MR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 15013863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.