These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8449687)

  • 1. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur.
    Gwiazda J; Thorn F; Bauer J; Held R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Mar; 34(3):690-4. PubMed ID: 8449687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia.
    Mutti DO; Mitchell GL; Hayes JR; Jones LA; Moeschberger ML; Cotter SA; Kleinstein RN; Manny RE; Twelker JD; Zadnik K;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 16505015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children.
    Nakatsuka C; Hasebe S; Nonaka F; Ohtsuki H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 15944822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia.
    Langaas T; Riddell PM; Svarverud E; Ystenaes AE; Langeggen I; Bruenech JR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18174839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binocular adaptation to +2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 19390469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A longitudinal study on the relationship between myopia development and near accommodation lag in myopic children.
    Weizhong L; Zhikuan Y; Wen L; Xiang C; Jian G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18201336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses.
    Jiang BC; Tea YC; O'Donnell D
    Optometry; 2007 Mar; 78(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 17321462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children.
    Mutti DO; Jones LA; Moeschberger ML; Zadnik K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Aug; 41(9):2469-78. PubMed ID: 10937556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children.
    Gwiazda J; Bauer J; Thorn F; Held R
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(9):1299-304. PubMed ID: 7610590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accommodative facility in eyes with and without myopia.
    Pandian A; Sankaridurg PR; Naduvilath T; O'Leary D; Sweeney DF; Rose K; Mitchell P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4725-31. PubMed ID: 17065480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of accommodation and refractive status on the peripheral refractive profile.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 93(9):1186-90. PubMed ID: 19525242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes.
    Abbott ML; Schmid KL; Strang NC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9666906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient Axial Length Change during the Accommodation Response in Young Adults.
    Mallen EA; Kashyap P; Hampson KM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1251-4. PubMed ID: 16505066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of altering spherical aberration on the static accommodative response.
    Theagarayan B; Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Calver RI; Rae SM; O'Leary DJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 19154282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal dioptric value of near addition lenses intended to slow myopic progression.
    Jiang BC; Bussa S; Tea YC; Seger K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1100-5. PubMed ID: 18981925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of heterophoria type and myopia on accommodative and vergence responses during sustained near activity in children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 57():9-17. PubMed ID: 22322001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tropicamide (1%): an effective cycloplegic agent for myopic children.
    Manny RE; Hussein M; Scheiman M; Kurtz D; Niemann K; Zinzer K;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Jul; 42(8):1728-35. PubMed ID: 11431435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus-response function in myopic subjects.
    Hazel CA; Cox MJ; Strang NC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 80(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 12597330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.