129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 844981)
1. The electrical stimulation of the retina by indwelling electrodes.
Dawson WW; Radtke ND
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1977 Mar; 16(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 844981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of an extraocular retinal prosthesis: evaluation of stimulation parameters in the cat.
Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 15(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 18586497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of extraocular electrodes for a retinal prosthesis using evoked potentials in cat visual cortex.
Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
J Clin Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 12(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 16051097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Activation zones in cat visual cortex evoked by electrical retina stimulation.
Schanze T; Wilms M; Eger M; Hesse L; Eckhorn R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):947-54. PubMed ID: 12486519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implantation and testing of subretinal film electrodes in domestic pigs.
Schanze T; Sachs HG; Wiesenack C; Brunner U; Sailer H
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Feb; 82(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 16125172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array.
Wong YT; Chen SC; Seo JM; Morley JW; Lovell NH; Suaning GJ
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):825-33. PubMed ID: 19272402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulation of the retina with a multielectrode extraocular visual prosthesis.
Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Aug; 75(8):697-704. PubMed ID: 16076336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual resolution with retinal implants estimated from recordings in cat visual cortex.
Eckhorn R; Wilms M; Schanze T; Eger M; Hesse L; Eysel UT; Kisvárday ZF; Zrenner E; Gekeler F; Schwahn H; Shinoda K; Sachs H; Walter P
Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2675-90. PubMed ID: 16571357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual cortex responses to single- and simultaneous multiple-electrode stimulation of the retina: implications for retinal prostheses.
Shivdasani MN; Fallon JB; Luu CD; Cicione R; Allen PJ; Morley JW; Williams CE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 53(10):6291-300. PubMed ID: 22899754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the efficacy of visual prostheses by decoding ms-LFPs: application to retinal implants.
Cottaris NP; Elfar SD
J Neural Eng; 2009 Apr; 6(2):026007. PubMed ID: 19289859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual cortex responses to suprachoroidal electrical stimulation of the retina: effects of electrode return configuration.
Cicione R; Shivdasani MN; Fallon JB; Luu CD; Allen PJ; Rathbone GD; Shepherd RK; Williams CE
J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036009. PubMed ID: 22595310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transscleral implantation and neurophysiological testing of subretinal polyimide film electrodes in the domestic pig in visual prosthesis development.
Sachs HG; Schanze T; Brunner U; Sailer H; Wiesenack C
J Neural Eng; 2005 Mar; 2(1):S57-64. PubMed ID: 15876656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of electrically evoked cortical potential thresholds generated with subretinal or suprachoroidal placement of a microelectrode array in the rabbit.
Yamauchi Y; Franco LM; Jackson DJ; Naber JF; Ziv RO; Rizzo JF; Kaplan HJ; Enzmann V
J Neural Eng; 2005 Mar; 2(1):S48-56. PubMed ID: 15876654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chronically implanted epidural electrodes in Göttinger minipigs allow function tests of epiretinal implants.
Laube T; Schanze T; Brockmann C; Bolle I; Stieglitz T; Bornfeld N
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 241(12):1013-9. PubMed ID: 14605905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatiotemporal interactions in the visual cortex following paired electrical stimulation of the retina.
Cicione R; Fallon JB; Rathbone GD; Williams CE; Shivdasani MN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):7726-38. PubMed ID: 25370517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distribution of retinal responses evoked by transscleral electrical stimulation detected by intrinsic signal imaging in macaque monkeys.
Inomata K; Tsunoda K; Hanazono G; Kazato Y; Shinoda K; Yuzawa M; Tanifuji M; Miyake Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2193-200. PubMed ID: 18436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical activation via an implanted wireless retinal prosthesis.
Walter P; Kisvárday ZF; Görtz M; Alteheld N; Rossler G; Stieglitz T; Eysel UT
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1780-5. PubMed ID: 15851582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous electrical stimulation decreases retinal excitability but does not alter retinal morphology.
Ray A; Lee EJ; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):045003. PubMed ID: 21775787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cortical (V1) neurophysiological recording model for assessing the efficacy of retinal visual prostheses.
Elfar SD; Cottaris NP; Iezzi R; Abrams GW
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 19464512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
