These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8450352)
1. Skeletal stability following miniplate fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Neyt L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 51(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 8450352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal stability following sagittal split osteotomy using monocortical miniplate internal fixation. Rubens BC; Stoelinga PJ; Blijdorp PA; Schoenaers JH; Politis C Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Dec; 17(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 3145953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation. Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The stability of facial osteotomies. 2. Mandibular advancement with bicortical screw fixation. Hoffman GR; Moloney FB Aust Dent J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 7575273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique. Becktor JP; Rebellato J; Sollenius O; Vedtofte P; Isaksson S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 18083423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sagittal split advancement osteotomy: comparison of the tendency to relapse after two different methods of rigid fixation. Kahnberg KE; Kashani H; Owman-Moll P Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2007; 41(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 17701729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term hard and soft tissue relapse rate after genioplasty. Talebzadeh N; Pogrel MA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11174590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of sagittal split osteotomies. A comparison of three stabilization techniques. Perrott DH; Lu YF; Pogrel MA; Kaban LB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Dec; 78(6):696-704. PubMed ID: 7898905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series. Yoon HJ; Rebellato J; Keller EE J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):629-34. PubMed ID: 15883936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different hybrid rigid internal fixation techniques on the postoperative stability following a mandibular advancement using a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective three-dimensional comparative study. Telha W; Al-Watary MQ; Sakran K; Chen H; Bi R; Zhu S; Jiang N J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 125(2):101667. PubMed ID: 38738550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible. Politi M; Costa F; Cian R; Polini F; Robiony M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 14762749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation. Thüer U; Ingervall B; Vuillemin T Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of combined Le Fort I maxillary advancement and mandibular reduction. Arpornmaeklong P; Shand JM; Heggie AA Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 14703330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cephalometric analysis of the long-term, soft tissue profile changes which accompany the advancement of the mandible by sagittal split ramus osteotomies. Mommaerts MY; Marxer H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1987 Jun; 15(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 3475285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment. Ricard D; Ferri J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of mandibular stability after sagittal split osteotomies: biocortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis. Fujioka M; Fujii T; Hirano A Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 11108524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are bicortical screw and plate osteosynthesis techniques equal in providing skeletal stability with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy when used for mandibular advancement surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Al-Moraissi EA; Al-Hendi EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1195-200. PubMed ID: 27185389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle. Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement. Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies during adolescence. den Besten CA; Mensink G; van Merkesteyn JP J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):e78-82. PubMed ID: 23253633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]