These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8450526)

  • 1. Early side-effects of antihypertensive therapy: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine retard.
    Bremner AD; Fell PJ; Hosie J; James IG; Saul PA; Taylor SH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1993 Feb; 7(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 8450526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Side effects of dihydropyridine therapy: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine retard.
    Hosie J; Bremner AD; Fell PJ; James GV; Saul PA; Taylor SH
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1993; 22 Suppl A():S9-12. PubMed ID: 7522287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine retard in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
    Lorimer AR; Anderson JA; Laher MS; Davies J; Lazarus JH; Taylor SH; Sanghera S
    J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Jan; 8(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8151609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Philipp T; Smith TR; Glazer R; Wernsing M; Yen J; Jin J; Schneider H; Pospiech R
    Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):563-80. PubMed ID: 17617280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antihypertensive effect of amlodipine compared with nifedipine retard in patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension.
    Kalina Z; Okopień B; Madej A; Tokarz D; Maślankiewicz A; Szwed Z; Gross-Furek V; Herman ZS
    Boll Chim Farm; 1998; 137(7):281-5. PubMed ID: 9795483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of early side effects with amlodipine and nifedipine retard in hypertension.
    Hosie J; Bremner AD; Fell PJ; James IG; Saul PA; Taylor SH
    Cardiology; 1992; 80 Suppl 1():54-9. PubMed ID: 1534716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of nilvadipine and amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a double blind, prospective, randomised clinical trial.
    Leonetti G;
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Jun; 21(6):951-8. PubMed ID: 15969895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of amlodipine and the nifedipine retard preparation in the treatment of arterial hypertension].
    Pivac N; Dobovisek J; Bagatin J; Gros Furek V; Rumboldt Z; Janezić A; Kveder R; Sjerobabski V; Simunić M; Sardelić S
    Lijec Vjesn; 1993; 115(11-12):356-9. PubMed ID: 8176999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the effects of two modified release preparations of nifedipine-nifedipine retard 10 mg twice daily and nifedipine GITS 20 mg once daily--in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
    Kirby BJ; Kitchin NR
    Int J Clin Pract; 1999; 53(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 10695096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved tolerability of felodipine compared with amlodipine in elderly hypertensives: a randomised, double-blind study in 535 patients, focusing on vasodilatory adverse events. The International Study Group.
    Schaefer RM; Aldons PM; Burgess ED; Tilvis R; Girerd X; Singh GP; Rehn L; Morgan TO
    Int J Clin Pract; 1998 Sep; 52(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 9894374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A comparison between amlodipine and nifedipine retard in patients with essential arterial hypertension].
    Terrachini V; Canale C; Lonati A; Masperone MA; Bruzzone F; Malvestiti FM; Caponnetto S
    Clin Ter; 1992 Apr; 140(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 1534044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.
    Kes S; Caglar N; Canberk A; Deger N; Demirtas M; Dortlemez H; Kiliccioglu B; Kozan O; Ovunc K; Turkoglu C
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2003; 19(3):226-37. PubMed ID: 12803737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.
    Lee HY; Kang HJ; Koo BK; Oh BH; Heung-Sun K; Kim KS; Seo HS; Ro YM; Kang JH; Woong CJ; Joo SJ; Kim MH; Joon-Han S; Yoon J; Park SH; Jin-Ok J; Ju AK; Chong-Yun R; Yeon KJ; Park KM; Lim DK; Park SY;
    Clin Ther; 2005 Jun; 27(6):728-39. PubMed ID: 16117979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients.
    de Champlain J; Karas M; Nguyen P; Cartier P; Wistaff R; Toal CB; Nadeau R; Larochelle P
    J Hypertens; 1998 Nov; 16(11):1357-69. PubMed ID: 9856375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients.
    de Champlain J; Karas M; Nguyen P; Cartier P; Wistaff R; Toal CB; Nadeau R; Larochelle P
    J Hypertens; 1998 Sep; 16(9):1357-69. PubMed ID: 9746123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine.
    Corea L; Cardoni O; Fogari R; Innocenti P; Porcellati C; Provvidenza M; Meilenbrock S; Sullivan J; Bodin F
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Sep; 60(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 8841157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persistence of the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS after two 'missed doses': a randomised, double-blind comparative trial in Asian patients.
    Ongtengco I; Morales D; Sanderson J; Lu ZR; Beilin LJ; Burke V; Puddey IB; Tanomsup S; Dayi H; Rahardjo P; Zambahari DR; Chen CY; Soenarta AA; Buranakitjaroen P; Tan C; Soon TK; Wu DJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Nov; 16(11):805-13. PubMed ID: 12444542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of amlodipine and nifedipine retard in patients with stable exertional angina and hypertension].
    Witkowska M; Tracz W; Kubler G; Negrusz-Kawecka M; Hlawaty M; Olszowska M; Salamon P
    Przegl Lek; 1997; 54(5):324-8. PubMed ID: 9380807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double-blind comparison between nifedipine and amlodipine for the treatment of essential hypertension.
    Cappuccio FP; Markandu ND; Singer DR; Crane M; Carney C; MacGregor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 1993 Aug; 7(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 8410927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.
    Lefebvre J; Poirier L; Archambault F; Jewell D; Reed CV; Lacourcière Y
    Can J Cardiol; 1998 May; 14(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 9627524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.