These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8451247)
1. Avoiding an unnecessary outcome. A comparative trial between IV3000 and a conventional film dressing to assess rates of catheter-related sepsis. Keenlyside D Prof Nurse; 1993 Feb; 8(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 8451247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new hydrocolloid occlusive dressing for central catheters used in total parenteral nutrition. Haffejee AA; Moodley J; Pillay K; Singh B; Thomson S; Bhamjee A S Afr J Surg; 1991 Dec; 29(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 1763392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients. Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of occlusive dressings on central venous catheter sites in hospitalized children. Taylor D; Myers ST; Monarch K; Leon C; Hall J; Sibley Y J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Jun; 11(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8667154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved long-term maintenance of central venous catheters with a new dressing technique. Eisenberg PG; Howard MP; Gianino MS J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 2401932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Care of the central venous catheterization site: the use of a transparent polyurethane film. Vazquez RM; Jarrard MM JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 6425522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings. Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature. Lau CE J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 9060348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do dressings with increased permeability reduce the incidence of central venous catheter related sepsis? Reynolds MG; Tebbs SE; Elliott TS Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1997 Feb; 13(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9095879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Once- versus twice-weekly changing of central venous catheter occlusive dressing in intensive chemotherapy patients: results of a randomized multicenter study. Vokurka S; Bystricka E; Visokaiova M; Scudlova J Med Sci Monit; 2009 Mar; 15(3):CR107-10. PubMed ID: 19247240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing Arglaes (a transparent dressing containing silver ions) to Tegaderm (a transparent polyurethane dressing) for dressing peripheral arterial catheters and central vascular catheters. Madeo M; Martin CR; Turner C; Kirkby V; Thompson DR Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1998 Aug; 14(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 9849245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sealing the catheter exit site with dressing film and its effectiveness in preventing exit-site infection: bacterial culture. Tanaka S Adv Perit Dial; 1996; 12():214-7. PubMed ID: 8865906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moisture vapor transmission rates of various transparent dressings at different temperatures and humidities. Lin YS; Chen J; Li Q; Pan KP Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):927-30. PubMed ID: 19493416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonocclusive, clean permanent right atrial catheter dressing change procedures compared with occlusive, sterile permanent right atrial catheter dressing change procedures in children with cancer. Hutchinson SK; Waskerwitz M; Martin K; Faubion W; Revesz S J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 1990 Apr; 7(2):71. PubMed ID: 2114124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis. Ciresi DL; Albrecht RM; Volkers PA; Scholten DJ Am Surg; 1996 Aug; 62(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 8712561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Central venous catheter related infections: comparison of polyurethane film and gauze/tape dressing]. Cicolini G; di Labio L; Copetti M; Lazzari S; Bucci I Prof Inferm; 2008; 61(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18462569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia. Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]