90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8451347)
21. An evaluation of favorite kind of day drawings from physically maltreated and non-maltreated children.
Veltman MW; Browne KD
Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Oct; 24(10):1249-55. PubMed ID: 11075693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Family Story Technique changes in interactions and affects during family therapy.
Kadushin P; Waxenberg SE; Sager CJ
J Pers Assess; 1971 Feb; 35(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 4950141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Field-dependence and performance on Piagetian invariance tasks: a cross-cultural comparison.
Bowd AD
J Genet Psychol; 1977 Mar; 130(1st Half):157-8. PubMed ID: 323419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques.
Lilienfeld SO; Wood JM; Garb HN
Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2000 Nov; 1(2):27-66. PubMed ID: 26151980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Maladjustment in statistical minorities within ethnically unbalanced classrooms.
Kaufman K; Gregory WL; Stephan WG
Am J Community Psychol; 1990 Oct; 18(5):757-65. PubMed ID: 2075901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Not Your Same Old Story: New Rules for Thematic Apperceptive Techniques (TATs).
Jenkins SR
J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(3):238-253. PubMed ID: 28379075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Projective drawings: helping adult survivors of childhood abuse recognize boundaries.
Glaister JA
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 1994 Oct; 32(10):28-34. PubMed ID: 7844767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethnocentric perception of childrearing practices in protective services.
Gray E; Cosgrove J
Child Abuse Negl; 1985; 9(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 4052846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Symbolic participation. The role of projective drawings in a case of child abuse.
Karp MR
Psychoanal Study Child; 1997; 52():260-300. PubMed ID: 9489471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A comparative study on family perception between abused children and normal children by Kinetic Family Drawing].
Lee HJ; Kim YH; Park NH
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2006 Apr; 36(2):265-77. PubMed ID: 16691044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Psychometric intelligence and spatial imagery in two Northwest Indian and two white groups of children.
Gaddes WH; McKenzie A; Barnsley R
J Soc Psychol; 1968 Jun; 75(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 5713288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The structured nonverbal assessment of personality.
Paunonen SV; Jackson DN; Keinonen M
J Pers; 1990 Sep; 58(3):481-502. PubMed ID: 2246746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fantasy confession among Arapaho Indian children.
Cocking RR
J Genet Psychol; 1969 Jun; 114(2d Half):229-35. PubMed ID: 4891487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicultural aspects of child abuse in Britain.
Qureshi B
J R Soc Med; 1989 Feb; 82(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 2926766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comment on Nelson, et al.: 'Comparative time estimation skills of Hispanic children'.
Dawson KA
Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1113-4. PubMed ID: 1501978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A TAT study of Navajo aging.
Goldstine T; Gutmann D
Psychiatry; 1972 Nov; 35(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 5086385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pitfalls in cross-cultural use of the Denver Developmental Screening Test: Cree Indian children.
Burke SO; Sayers LA; Baumgart AJ; Wray JG
Can J Public Health; 1985; 76(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 4084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A note on the cross-cultural fruit-tree study: a test-retest procedure.
Adler LL
J Psychol; 1968 May; 69(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 4872203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of the Dennis Uses Test to Canadian children.
Al-Issa I
Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Feb; 26(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 5642522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross-cultural and intracultural attitudes of Lapp and Norwegian children.
Guggenheim F; Hoem A
J Soc Psychol; 1967 Oct; 73(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 4862896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
