154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8451676)
1. Low-cost screening mammography: results of 21,141 consecutive examinations in a community program.
Lynde JL
South Med J; 1993 Mar; 86(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 8451676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development and implementation of standards of care in a breast cancer screening program.
Nielsen B; Miaskowski C; McCoy C; Rudisch M
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2003118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: results and implications.
Haiart DC; Henderson J
Br J Clin Pract; 1991; 45(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1931542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring the performance of screening mammography in community practice with Medicare claims data.
Freeman JL; Goodwin JS; Zhang D; Nattinger AB; Freeman DH
Women Health; 2003; 37(2):1-15. PubMed ID: 12733550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months.
Burhenne LJ; Hislop TG; Burhenne HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 1307850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance.
Goelen G; De Clercq G; Hanssens S
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Jul; 37(4):E312-7. PubMed ID: 20591795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
Peek ME; Han J
J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mass screening for breast cancer in Herault county. First results in women between 40 and 70 years old].
Daures JP; Peray P; Bousquet J; Stoebner A; Gouzes C; Lamarque JL; Laurent JC; Cherif Cheikh J; Boulet P; Pujol J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 1583294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.
Hendrick RE; Cutter GR; Berns EA; Nakano C; Egger J; Carney PA; Abraham L; Taplin SH; D'Orsi CJ; Barlow W; Elmore JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 15671359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low cost mammography screening. Practical considerations with emphasis on mobile operation.
Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1688-91. PubMed ID: 3651995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancement of true-positive rates for nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast through mammographic selection.
McManus V; Desautels JE; Benediktsson H; Pasieka J; Lafreniere R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Sep; 175(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 1514155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-initiated mobile mammography: analysis of the patients and the problems.
Rubin E; Frank MS; Stanley RJ; Bernreuter WK; Han SY
South Med J; 1990 Feb; 83(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 2305298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to establish a cost-effective mobile mammography program.
Carkaci S; Geiser WR; Adrada BE; Marquez C; Whitman GJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):W691-7. PubMed ID: 24147498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Streamlining mobile mammography services. Concern over loss of quality.
McCue P
Appl Radiol; 1987 Dec; 16(12):27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10285605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening.
Wang H; Kåresen R; Hervik A; Thoresen SO
Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Jan; 12(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11227924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality-oriented mass mammography screening.
Burhenne LJ; Burhenne HJ; Kan L
Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 7997549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reference standards in the performance of a mammographic screening program. Results of the screening program in the province of Florence, 1992].
Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Rosselli del Turco M
Radiol Med; 1993 Oct; 86(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 8248583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First organized screening mammography programme in Saudi Arabia: preliminary analysis of pilot round.
Akhtar SS; Nadrah HM; Al-Habdan MA; El Gabbani SA; El Farouk GM; Abdelgadir MH; Al-Saigul AM
East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Oct; 16(10):1025-31. PubMed ID: 21222417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
Brown ML; Houn F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
