129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8452383)
1. [Experimental and clinical study in vitro chemosensitivity test for succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test].
Maehara Y; Takeuchi H; Inutsuka S; Baba H; Kohnoe S; Sugimachi K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Mar; 20(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 8452383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The sensitivity of 1,000 human tumors to antitumor drugs using the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition (SDI) test].
Miyamoto K; Fukuchi K
Rinsho Byori; 1990 Nov; 38(11):1273-8. PubMed ID: 2273570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [In vitro chemosensitivity test: succinate dehydrogenase inhibition (SDI) test].
Maehara Y; Kohnoe S; Emi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Sugimachi K
Rinsho Byori; 1990 Jan; 38(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2308218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study of in vitro cancer sensitivity of anticancer drugs by SDI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test)].
Kikuchi Y
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Dec; 21(16):2757-62. PubMed ID: 7993111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemosensitivity testing of human lung cancer tissues using the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test.
Mitsudomi T; Kaneko S; Tateishi M; Yano T; Ishida T; Kohnoe S; Maehara Y; Sugimachi K
Anticancer Res; 1990; 10(4):987-90. PubMed ID: 2382998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of succinic dehydrogenase inhibition test with adenosine triphosphate inhibition assay for human solid tumors as in vitro chemosensitivity tests].
Saeki T; Jinushi K; Kim R; Kirihara Y; Takagami S; Nishiyama M; Saeki K; Niimoto M; Hattori T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1989 May; 16(5):2025-30. PubMed ID: 2730092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical studies of in vitro chemosensitivity test evaluated by ATP assay of gastrointestinal cancer].
Jinushi K; Hirabayashi N; Kirihara Y; Takagami S; Ryuji K; Yorishima T; Nishiyama M; Noso Y; Toge T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1990 Nov; 17(11):2235-9. PubMed ID: 2122811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung adenocarcinoma is more sensitive than gastric adenocarcinoma to anticancer drugs in vitro.
Kohnoe S; Moriguchi S; Emi Y; Sakaguchi Y; Maehara Y; Ishida T; Mitsudomi T; Sugimachi K
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Feb; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1995357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chemosensitivity differences between primary and metastatic lesions of clinical gastric cancer.
Kusumoto H; Maehara Y; Kusumoto T; Anai H; Akazawa K; Sugimachi K
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1988 Dec; 14(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 3192005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [In vitro chemosensitivity of various human tumors evaluated by the SDI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibition) test].
Maehara Y; Anai H; Masuda H; Tamada R; Sugimachi K; Inokuchi K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Oct; 12(10):2018-23. PubMed ID: 4051518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [In vitro chemosensitivity of various human tumors evaluated by the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition (SDI) test (2)].
Anai H; Maehara Y; Kusumoto H; Masuda H; Miyamoto K; Fukuchi K; Tamada R; Sugimachi K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1986 Aug; 13(8):2544-8. PubMed ID: 3740857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the subrenal capsule assay and succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test.
Iwagaki H; Fuchimoto S; Orita K
J Med; 1989; 20(3-4):251-60. PubMed ID: 2809423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison between clinical response and in vitro chemosensitivity of solid tumors in the succinic dehydrogenase inhibition test].
Asanuma F; Yamada Y; Kawamura E; Kurokawa T; Lee KE; Yamada T; Suzuki T; Suzuki Y; Fujinaga S; Kubota T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1992 Jan; 19(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 1729963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test and ATP assay for in vitro chemosensitivity testing].
Maehara Y; Miyamoto K; Anai H; Kusumoto H; Fukuchi K; Masuda H; Sugimachi K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1987 Mar; 14(3 Pt 1):630-4. PubMed ID: 3827259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [In vitro thermosensitivity of various human tumors evaluated using the SDI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibition) test].
Fukuchi K; Miyamoto K
Rinsho Byori; 1990 Aug; 38(8):957-9. PubMed ID: 2232261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Growth chamber assay, a novel chemosensitivity test which eliminates normal stromal cells].
Tetsuya T; Tetsuro K; Hiroshi Y; Touru T; Toshiharu F; Suguru K; Susumu K; Kyuya I; Osahiko A; Hirokazu Y
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Apr; 18(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 1901475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of predictability of in vitro SDI assay in comparison with in vivo nude mouse assay].
Fujita M; Tanigawa K; Fujita F; Sakamoto Y; Shimozuma K; Kusuyama T; Inaba H; Taguchi T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1989 Oct; 16(10):3435-41. PubMed ID: 2802637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Chemotherapy for metastatic brain tumors with CDDP and other agents: correlation between chemotherapeutic effects and the results of in vitro chemosensitivity tests using collagen gel-embedded culture combined with computerized image analysis in metastatic brain tumors].
Nakagawa H; Kobayashi H; Koezuka M; Yamada M; Miyawaki Y; Tokiyoshi K; Kanayama T; Hagiwara Y; Tsuruzono K
No Shinkei Geka; 1994 Jun; 22(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 8015671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antitumor chemosensitivity differs between clinical sarcoma and adenocarcinoma tissues.
Takeuchi H; Baba H; Inutsuka S; Takahashi I; Kusumoto H; Maehara Y; Sugimachi K
Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(1A):169-71. PubMed ID: 8166444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro histoculture of human tumors with fluorescent dye end-points measured by confocal microscopy: high correlation of in vitro and in vivo chemosensitivity.
Guo HY; Colangelo D; Li L; Connors KM; Kubota T; Hoffman RM
Anticancer Res; 1992; 12(4):1055-61. PubMed ID: 1323946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
