These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8453014)
1. A quality control system involving peer review of abnormal cervical smears. Palli D; Confortini M; Biggeri A; Russo A; Cariaggi P; Carozzi F; Minuti PA Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8453014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program]. Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control. Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme. Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in the assessment of adequacy in cervical smears. Migliore G; Rossi E; Aldovini A; Mudu P; Alderisio M; Giovagnoli MR; Fabiano A; Morosini PL; Branca M Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 11843939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 100% rapid rescreening for quality assurance in a quality control program in a public health cytologic laboratory. Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Dall' Agnol M; di Loreto C; Pirani WM; Utagawa ML; Pereira SM; Sakai YI; Feres CL; Shih LW; Yamamoto LS; Rodrigues RO; Shirata NK; Longatta Filho A Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 16450904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal quality assurance in cervical cytology one laboratory's experience. Cross PA Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8833871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Educational needs and causes of false diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital. Kumar N; Sayed S; Moloo Z Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21987946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of blind peer review (team reading) of equivocal/abnormal Papanicolaou smears on inter-reader agreement. Placidi A; Giorgi Rossi P Cytopathology; 2019 Jan; 30(1):105-108. PubMed ID: 30276905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical smears. Kashyap V; Murthy NS; Bhatnagar P; Sharma S; Das DK Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 38(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 9726147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intralaboratory reproducibility in cervical cytology. Results of the application of a 100-slide set. Confortini M; Biggeri A; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi FM; Minuti PA; Russo A; Palli D Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8434496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening. Faraker CA Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8453016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance report: a national survey. Confortini M; Carozzi F; Dalla Palma P; Ghiringhello B; Parisio F; Prandi S; Ronco G; Ciatto S; Montanari G; Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 14510890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories. Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Nieminen P; Suwanrungraung K; Kamsa-ard S; Parkin DM Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 16101335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interlaboratory reproducibility in reporting inadequate cervical smears--a multicentre multinational study. Ciatto S; Cariaggi MP; Minuti AP; Confortini M; Palli D; Pas L; McKee G; Schenck U; Bonaccorsi A; Corradi G; Olivati S; Pieri L; Carretti D; Cocchi V Cytopathology; 1996 Dec; 7(6):386-90. PubMed ID: 8958471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False negative rate in cervical cytology. van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP J Clin Pathol; 1987 Apr; 40(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 3584488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External quality assurance in cervical/vaginal cytology: Interlaboratory agreement in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy. Cocchi V; Sintoni C; Carretti D; Sama D; Chiari U; Segala V; Delazer AL; Grilli N; Papaleo R; Ghirardini C; Bucchi L Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 8669183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of specimen adequacy reproducibility: an Italian experience. Montanari G; Confortini M; Bellomi A; Cocchi V; Dalla Palma P; D'Ambrosio E; Giovagnoli MR; Navone R; Ronco G; Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 12672101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of negative cervical smears as a quality assurance measure. Manrique EJ; Amaral RG; Souza NL; Tavares SB; Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16719853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]