These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8454247)

  • 21. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Are conventional dental x-ray films a thing of the past?].
    Sanderink GC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Dec; 102(12):496-8. PubMed ID: 11836821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital image ratio: a new radiographic method for quantifying changes in alveolar bone. Part 1: Theory and methodology.
    Jean A; Epelboin Y; Rimsky A; Soyer A; Ouhayoun JP
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Apr; 31(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 8814585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An old/new idea for reducing exposure to x-rays.
    Colquitt WN; Richards AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 6960314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The digital reprocessing of underexposed x-rays. Studies with a fluorescent light scanner].
    Hidajat N; Schröder RJ; Bergh B; Cordes M; Felix R
    Rofo; 1994 Sep; 161(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 7919250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigation of the imaging properties of an x-ray film scanner.
    Döler W; Rassow S; Jäger A; Vosshenrich R
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 May; 39(5):917-22. PubMed ID: 15552094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
    Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of detail and greyscale range in X-ray fluoroscopy images captured with a personal computer and frame-grabber.
    Okkalides D
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 23(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 8886729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital dental image processing of alveolar bone: Macintosh II personal computer software.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Gravier MJ; Shrout MK; Knapp RH; Walkup RK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 1397472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intra-oral computed radiography--an in vitro evaluation.
    Lim KF; Loh EE; Hong YH
    J Dent; 1996 Sep; 24(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 8916652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A Challenge of Digitalizing the X-ray Film Image, and the Recent Technical Trends].
    Yamada M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2021; 41(3):111-116. PubMed ID: 34744120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.