BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8454315)

  • 1. Development of a resource-based patient classification scheme for rehabilitation.
    Harada N; Kominski G; Sofaer S
    Inquiry; 1993; 30(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 8454315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Did the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system result in changes in relative patient severity and relative resource use?
    Paddock SM; Escarce JJ; Hayden O; Buntin MB
    Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17224774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rehabilitation costs: implications for prospective payment.
    Schlenker RE; Kramer AM; Hrincevich CA; Eilertsen TB
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Dec; 32(5):651-68. PubMed ID: 9402906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the prospective payment system: lessons learned.
    Zorowitz RD
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Jun; 45(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 19532112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for FY 2006. Final rule.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2005 Aug; 70(156):47879-8006. PubMed ID: 16106591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2009. Final rule.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(154):46369-414. PubMed ID: 18949882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of functional status measures for payment of medical rehabilitation services.
    Wilkerson DL; Batavia AI; DeJong G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Feb; 73(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 1543404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicare program; changes to the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system and fiscal year 2004 rates. Final rule.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2003 Aug; 68(148):45673-728. PubMed ID: 12901386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in the supply of inpatient rehabilitation facilities services: 1996 to 2004.
    Mallinson TR; Manheim LM; Almagor O; Demark HM; Heinemann AW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2066-79. PubMed ID: 18996234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The state-of-the-science: challenges in designing postacute care payment policy.
    Chan L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 88(11):1522-5. PubMed ID: 17964899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities are now paid prospective rates.
    Grimaldi PL
    J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):32-48. PubMed ID: 12079150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2008. Final rule.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2007 Aug; 72(151):44283-335. PubMed ID: 17687798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prospective payment in medical rehabilitation].
    Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Jun; 42(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12813650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of functional outcome and resource utilization in inpatient rehabilitation.
    Rondinelli RD; Murphy JR; Wilson DH; Miller CC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Jun; 72(7):447-53. PubMed ID: 1905529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the planned substitution of the minimum data set-post acute care for use in the rehabilitation hospital prospective payment system.
    Buchanan JL; Andres PL; Haley SM; Paddock SM; Zaslavsky AM
    Med Care; 2004 Feb; 42(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 14734953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective payment for medical rehabilitation: the DHHS report to Congress.
    Batavia AI; DeJong G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 May; 69(5):377-80. PubMed ID: 3130032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early effects of the prospective payment system on inpatient rehabilitation hospital performance.
    McCue MJ; Thompson JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 87(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 16442972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2010. Final rule.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(151):39761-838. PubMed ID: 19691169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Casemix classification payment for sub-acute and non-acute inpatient care, Thailand.
    Khiaocharoen O; Pannarunothai S; Zungsontiporn C; Riewpaiboon W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):849-59. PubMed ID: 20649066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The story of function-related groups--please, first do no harm.
    Stineman MG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Apr; 82(4):553-7. PubMed ID: 11295021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.