These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8454552)

  • 21. Confidence interval criteria for assessment of dose proportionality.
    Smith BP; Vandenhende FR; DeSante KA; Farid NA; Welch PA; Callaghan JT; Forgue ST
    Pharm Res; 2000 Oct; 17(10):1278-83. PubMed ID: 11145235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components.
    Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):363-70. PubMed ID: 19134071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Type I and Type II error under random-effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.
    Litière S; Alonso A; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1038-44. PubMed ID: 17425642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A note on type II error under random effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.
    Neuhaus JM; McCulloch CE; Boylan R
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):654-6; disucssion 656-60. PubMed ID: 21689077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A delayed neural network for solving linear projection equations and its analysis.
    Liu Q; Cao J; Xia Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2005 Jul; 16(4):834-43. PubMed ID: 16121725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fixed and random effects selection in linear and logistic models.
    Kinney SK; Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):690-8. PubMed ID: 17403104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
    Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Technical note: an R package for fitting generalized linear mixed models in animal breeding.
    Vazquez AI; Bates DM; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Weigel KA
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 19820058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variance of prediction error with mixed model equations when relationships are ignored.
    Van Vleck LD
    Theor Appl Genet; 1993 Jan; 85(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 24195928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pedigree analysis for quantitative traits: variance components without matrix inversion.
    Thompson EA; Shaw RG
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):399-413. PubMed ID: 2364130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit.
    Strandén I; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jun; 92(6):2971-5. PubMed ID: 19448030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Testing for interaction in two-way random and mixed effects models: the fully nonparametric approach.
    Gaugler T; Akritas MG
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1314-20. PubMed ID: 21401567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Log-normal frailty models fitted as Poisson generalized linear mixed models.
    Hirsch K; Wienke A; Kuss O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Dec; 137():167-175. PubMed ID: 28110722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient.
    Masuda Y; Misztal I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DA; Fragomeni BO; Aguilar I
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 28177357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A space efficient flexible pivot selection approach to evaluate determinant and inverse of a matrix.
    Jafree HA; Imtiaz M; Inayatullah S; Khan FH; Nizami T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87219. PubMed ID: 24498300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The statistical performance of an MCF-7 cell culture assay evaluated using generalized linear mixed models and a score test.
    Rey deCastro B; Neuberg D
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2501-18. PubMed ID: 17109375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of nonadditive genetic variances for a total-merit model including maternal effects.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Aug; 71(8):2006-11. PubMed ID: 8376222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Issues in use of SAS PROC.MIXED to test the significance of treatment effects in controlled clinical trials.
    Ahn C; Tonidandel S; Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 10803729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in expectation maximization restricted maximum likelihood estimation of the linear mixed model.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH; Strandén I; Thompson R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Dec; 129(6):457-68. PubMed ID: 23148971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.