These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 845549)

  • 1. Recognition of random shapes followed at varying delays by attended or unattended shapes, digits, and line grids.
    Hines D; Smith S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Jan; 3(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 845549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task difficulty and visual similarity increase a distractor's effects on random shapes.
    Hines D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):235-48. PubMed ID: 643480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate and delayed recognition of sequentially presented random shapes.
    Hines D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Sep; 1(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 1176896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition gradients for random shapes following distinctive or equivalent verbal association training.
    Daniel TC; Toglia MP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Jul; 2(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 932652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lingering effects of inattention on the recognition of novel forms.
    Becker DV
    Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 19585347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
    Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
    Tong Y; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.
    Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Sep; 2(5):509-22. PubMed ID: 1003124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions.
    Ballesteros S; Reales JM; García E; Carrasco M
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 17296015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nature of discriminating and categorizing functions of verbal labels on recognition memory for shape.
    Nagae S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jul; 6(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 7391756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The time course of configural change detection for novel 3-D objects.
    Favelle S; Palmisano S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):999-1012. PubMed ID: 20436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nature of memory related activity in early visual areas.
    Slotnick SD; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2874-86. PubMed ID: 16901520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Levels-of-processing effects in infant memory?
    Adler SA; Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    Child Dev; 1998 Apr; 69(2):280-94. PubMed ID: 9586205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delayed shape matching benefits from simplicity and symmetry.
    Kayaert G; Wagemans J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):708-17. PubMed ID: 19192483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iconic-memory processing of unfamiliar stimuli by retarded and nonretarded individuals.
    Hornstein HA; Mosley JL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Jul; 84(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 484605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual short-term cued recall memory in infancy.
    Brody LR
    Child Dev; 1981 Mar; 52(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 7238148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual recogition of dot-pattern bigrams: an extension and replication.
    Cohene LS; Bechtoldt HP
    Am J Psychol; 1975 Jun; 88(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 1200184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control of working memory: effects of attention training on target recognition and distractor salience in an auditory selection task.
    Melara RD; Tong Y; Rao A
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1430():68-77. PubMed ID: 22099165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.