BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8455493)

  • 1. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. X-ray image intensifier performance and patient doses for combinations of supplemental beam filters and vascular contrast agents.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 46(1):227-44. PubMed ID: 11197674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of beam-hardening artifacts in x-ray computerized tomography with gadolinium and iodine contrast agents.
    Ruth C; Joseph PM
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):1977-82. PubMed ID: 8746702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filter material selection for region of interest radiologic imaging.
    Massoumzadeh P; Rudin S; Bednarek DR
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9507475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1853-63. PubMed ID: 7700192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
    Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 11243349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
    Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy.
    Gagne RM; Quinn PW; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 8164575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose optimization in cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; McMillan C; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091911. PubMed ID: 24007162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of fixed filtration for rapid kVp-switching dual energy x-ray systems.
    Yao Y; Wang AS; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031914. PubMed ID: 24593732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.