These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8455493)

  • 41. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography.
    Aufrichtig R
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1349-58. PubMed ID: 10435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Error analysis of marker-based object localization using a single-plane XRII.
    Habets DF; Pollmann SI; Yuan X; Peters TM; Holdsworth DW
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 19235387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1595-604. PubMed ID: 8551983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.
    Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
    Kyprianou IS; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. CT Image Contrast of High-Z Elements: Phantom Imaging Studies and Clinical Implications.
    FitzGerald PF; Colborn RE; Edic PM; Lambert JW; Torres AS; Bonitatibus PJ; Yeh BM
    Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):723-33. PubMed ID: 26356064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Photon counting spectral CT: improved material decomposition with K-edge-filtered x-rays.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 22398007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. CT angiography of the renal arteries: comparison of lower-tube-voltage CTA with moderate-concentration iodinated contrast material and conventional CTA.
    Cho ES; Yu JS; Ahn JH; Kim JH; Chung JJ; Lee HK; Lee KH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 22733899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: theoretical feasibility of the liquid crystal light valve for radiography.
    Rieppo PK; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1279-91. PubMed ID: 9284252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A detector for scanned projection radiography.
    Sones RA; Lauro KL; Cattell CL
    Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 2326481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film system and third generation computed radiography.
    Cook LT; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Cox GG
    Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 7935205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.