These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8455987)

  • 41. Dealing with conflicting reviewers' comments.
    Johnson SH
    Nurse Author Ed; 1996; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 8868722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Research ethics, the establishment of a nursing research profile--who owns the knowledge?
    Watson J
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 1999; 17(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 10776085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. . Nursing research unit to face Parliamentary scrutiny.
    O'Dowd A
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 4-10; 96(18):11. PubMed ID: 11961815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Grant writing for qualitative research.
    Cohen MZ; Knafl K; Dzurec LC
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1993; 25(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 8340125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater? A lateral view of nursing research.
    Happell B
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2007 Apr; 16(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 17348956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How to assess a research study.
    Rankin M; Esteves MD
    Am J Nurs; 1996 Dec; 96(12):32-6; quiz 37. PubMed ID: 8961860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Factors related to graduate nursing faculty scholarly productivity.
    Barhyte DY; Redman BK
    Nurs Res; 1993; 42(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 8506168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What we mean when we talk about "conflict of interest".
    Frey JJ
    WMJ; 2007 Apr; 106(2):49. PubMed ID: 17479817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH; Freda MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Chance and consensus in peer review.
    Cole S; Cole JR; Simon GA
    Science; 1981 Nov; 214(4523):881-6. PubMed ID: 7302566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vulnerable research participants: anyone may qualify.
    Jacobson GA
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Oct; 18(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 16210752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 10 good questions for understanding nursing research.
    Learn CD
    Beginnings; 2002; 22(1):10, 15. PubMed ID: 11842640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Conflict of interest: an important issue in nutrition research and communications.
    Rock CL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1999 Jan; 99(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 9917728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The importance of a peer review journal for Public Health Nursing.
    Abrams SE; Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2013 Jan; 30(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23294380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Protection of human research subjects: proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Aug; 44(158):47687-729. PubMed ID: 10242808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Generating research in mental health nursing.
    Butterworth T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 1991; 28(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 1938180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Peer Review.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2017 Mar; 26(2):146-7. PubMed ID: 30304600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Student research.
    Gelling L
    Nurse Res; 2010; 17(3):3. PubMed ID: 20450082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Don't send it yet! Getting your manuscript ready to submit.
    Robinson R; Rivers DL
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 14562511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.