These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8456173)
1. Patients die in hospital fire: failure to follow protocols. Case in point: Stacy v. Truman Medical Center (836 S.W. 2d 911--MO [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Jan; 33(8):4. PubMed ID: 8456173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When patients refuse to cooperate--nurses may be responsible! Case in point: Hackathom v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center (624 S.W.2d 472--MO (1991)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 May; 32(12):2. PubMed ID: 1410389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure to follow dr.'s orders: post-op orthopedic pt. injured. Case on point: Redel v. Capital Region Medical Center, 2005 WL 1084105 S.W.3d--MO. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 May; 45(12):4. PubMed ID: 15981978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse contracts hepatitis-B: "dual capacity" issue. Case in point: Gatlin v. Truman Medical Center (770 S.W. 2d 510--MO (1989)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Aug; 30(3):4. PubMed ID: 2772219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse temporarily in ICU increases dosage without authorization. Woodward v. Research Medical Center, 2005 WL 2007878 S.W.3d -MO. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Oct; 46(5):4. PubMed ID: 16312115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to follow doctors' orders and documentation. Case in point: Hurlock v. Park Lane Medical Center (709 S.W.2d 872 - MO.). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):4. PubMed ID: 3638743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are nurses often sued as individual defendants? Case in point: Pastchol v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 929 S.W.2d 713--AR (1996). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Dec; 37(7):4. PubMed ID: 9256786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stillborn released to intoxicated husband: outrage suit. Case in point: Neff v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (799 S.W. 2d 795--AR (1990)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Feb; 31(9):4. PubMed ID: 1852894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Flame emanates from patient's throat: death results. Case in point: Schmidt v. Gibbs (807 S.W. 2d 928--AR (1991)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Aug; 32(3):4. PubMed ID: 1924821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Live birth question: wrongful death action. Case in point: Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Mem. Hosp. (761 S.W. 2d 785--TX (1988)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):4. PubMed ID: 2704835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Bed sores' were the cause of a patient's death. Case on point : Parson v. Interfaith medical Center, 700 N.Y.S. 2d 224- NY (1999). Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Mar; 40(10):4. PubMed ID: 11995174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CRNA gives anesthesia without approval: death results. Case in point: Briggins v. Shelby Medical Center (585 So. 2d 912--AL (1991)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Dec; 32(7):2. PubMed ID: 1767026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Nurse of death' kills patients at VA Hospital: US. liable. Case on point: Havrum v. United States of America, 204 F.3d 815 (2000). Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Jun; 41(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse delays reporting sexual assault on patient. Case in point: K.L.v. Riverside Medical Center 524 N.W. 2d 300--MN (1994). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Feb; 35(9):4. PubMed ID: 7701071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Policies and procedures: friend or foe? Part 2. Austin S Nurs Manage; 2001 Feb; 32(2):25. PubMed ID: 15103809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurse "log rolls" solo: adverse effects. Case in point: Routh v. St. John's Mercy Med. Center (785 S.W. 2d 744--MO (1990)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):4. PubMed ID: 2377732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]